Cited by 35Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMycobacterium research and diagnosisInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Mycobacterial autofluorescence in Papanicolaou‐stained lymph node aspirates: A glimmer in the dark?

Wright, Colleen A., van Zyl, Yvonne, Burgess, Steven M., Blumberg, Lucille, Leiman, Gladwyn·2004·Diagnostic Cytopathology

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the value of incorporating fluorescence into cytopathological evaluation of lymph node fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) specimens suspected of harboring mycobacterial species. The study population consisted of 1,044 HIV‐positive and ‐negative patients referred for FNA to the cytopathology unit of a South African medical school located in a very high HIV prevalence region. Each aspirate was assessed on routine Papanicolaou‐stained slides for morphologic characteristics of mycobacterial infection. The same glass slides were then viewed under fluorescent microscopy to determine the presence or absence of mycobacterial autofluorescence. Using multivariate analysis, results of both cytology and fluorescence were compared with mycobacterial culture as the final arbiter of the presence of organisms. In this large clinical study, compared with culture, cytomorphology showed sensitivity of 84.9%, but low specificity of only 50.9%. Fluorescence demonstrated lower sensitivity of 65.9%, but improved specificity of 73.0%. Taken together, positivity of both cytology and fluorescence improved specificity to 81.8%. Fluorescent microscopy is rapid, inexpensive, and cost‐effective; neither radioactive materials nor further staining are required. It is felt that this methodology would be of diagnostic benefit if used on morphologically suspicious samples in areas with a high prevalence of HIV and mycobacterial infections. Appropriate therapy could be commenced within hours of FNA, with reduction in the current number of patients lost to follow‐up while awaiting results of culture. The technique is readily extended to other FNA types such as deep organ aspirates. Autofluorescence of organisms specifically requires usage of Papanicolaou staining; the technique cannot be used in histopathologic specimens stained with hematoxylin‐eosin. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2004;30:257–260. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dc.20009

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, C. A., van Zyl, Y., Burgess, S. M., Blumberg, L., & Leiman, G.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Venue
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-23
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
257-260
ISSN
  • 1097-0339 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1039
OpenAlex
W2129128452
Cited by
35
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnostic Cytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
mycobacterial infection, lymph node fine needle aspiration, fluorescence microscopy, Papanicolaou staining, cell morphology, HIV, mycobacterial culture, sensitivity and specificity, rapid diagnosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Fluorescence, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mycobacterium, Mycobacterium Infections, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, HIV Infections, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review