Cited by 47Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPhonetics and Phonology Research

Habituation, sensitization, and infants' responses to motherse speech

Kaplan, Peter S., Goldstein, Michael H., Huckeby, Elizabeth R., Cooper, Robin Panneton·1995·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

Four‐month‐old infants were tested for their visual responses to infant‐directed (ID) speech versus adult‐directed (AD) speech in a fixed‐trial habituation procedure. In Experiment I, infants looked significantly longer in response to a 4 × 4 checkerboard pattern that was compounded with an ID speech segment than an AD speech segment. Looking times increased significantly between the first and second presentations of the ID speech segment only. In Experiment II, infants looked slightly more during ID than AD trials when the two were alternated from trial to trial. Responding to the first AD speech segment was significantly greater than when it was preceded by ID speech than when it was not, while responding to the first ID speech segment was significantly less when it was preceded by AD speech than when it was not. These findings are discussed in relation to the hypothesized differential arousing properties of ID and AD speech. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.420280105

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaplan, P. S., Goldstein, M. H., Huckeby, E. R., & Cooper, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Peter S.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
45-57
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2138732484
Cited by
47
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd019143-09)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 19143)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
infant-directed speech, adult-directed speech, habituation, sensitization, looking time, four-month-old infants
MeSH terms
Child Development, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Infant, Mother-Child Relations, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review