Cited by 25Language Development and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Health and Development

Maternal depression and the learning-promoting effects of infant-directed speech: Roles of maternal sensitivity, depression diagnosis, and speech acoustic cues

Open access
Kaplan, Peter S., Danko, Christina M., Cejka, Anna M., Everhart, Kevin D.·2015·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

The hypothesis that the associative learning-promoting effects of infant-directed speech (IDS) depend on infants' social experience was tested in a conditioned-attention paradigm with a cumulative sample of 4- to 14-month-old infants. Following six forward pairings of a brief IDS segment and a photographic slide of a smiling female face, infants of clinically depressed mothers exhibited evidence of having acquired significantly weaker voice-face associations than infants of non-depressed mothers. Regression analyses revealed that maternal depression was significantly related to infant learning even after demographic correlates of depression, antidepressant medication use, and extent of pitch modulation in maternal IDS had been taken into account. However, after maternal depression had been accounted for, maternal emotional availability, coded by blind raters from separate play interactions, accounted for significant further increments in the proportion of variance accounted for in infant learning scores. Both maternal depression and maternal insensitivity negatively, and additively, predicted poor learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.06.011

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal insensitivity plays an important role in delays in children's cognitive development.

    “One of the studies147 specifically emphasized the important role of maternal insensitivity in delays in children’s cognitive development.”

    From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [147]

    The Discussion (page not provided) links low maternal sensitivity to reduced infant learning from infant-directed speech and suggests this could slow the accumulation of knowledge. But it explicitly says that no evidence has linked deficits in the learning task to general cognitive development, so the claim about delays in children’s cognitive development goes beyond the study’s findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many studies indicated significant and negative associations between maternal postpartum depressive symptoms and infant cognitive development, language development, infant behaviors, overall infant health concerns, and quality of sleep.

    “Moreover, many studies indicated significant and negative associations between maternal postpartum depressive symptoms and infant cognitive development,94,95,99,101,102,107,141,147 language development,94,102,105,116,117,131,132,139 infant behaviors,49,52,110,114,120,121,131,133 overall infant health concerns,48,104,119,122–124,135,136,138 and quality of sleep.104,108”

    From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [147]

    The Results (§3.4–3.5; page unavailable) report significantly weaker voice–face associative learning among infants of mothers with a current depression diagnosis or elevated depressive-symptom scores. This supports a negative association with a specific infant learning measure, but the Discussion (§4; page unavailable) says no evidence yet links deficits on this test to general cognitive development. The paper does not establish the broader developmental outcome stated in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effect of maternal depression on infant learning remains significant after accounting for maternal sensitivity (p < 0.05).

    “but the effect of maternal depression remained significant (p < 0.05).”
  • After accounting for maternal sensitivity, the effect of maternal hostility on infant learning is no longer significant (p = 0.16).

    “after this effect was accounted for, the effects of maternal hostility were no longer significant (p = 0.16),”
  • Current depression diagnosis accounts for a significant proportion of the variance in infant learning.

    “Current depression diagnosis accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in infant learning.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck AT Steer RA Brown GK 1996 BDI-II: 2nd edition manual San Antonio, TX The Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaplan, P. S., Danko, C. M., Cejka, A. M., & Everhart, K. D.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Peter S.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
41
Pages
52-63
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1188018934
Cited by
25
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD049732)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
maternal depression, infant-directed speech, associative learning, maternal sensitivity, maternal emotional availability, pitch modulation, acoustic cues, antidepressants
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Antidepressive Agents, Attention, Child Development, Cues, Depression, Ethnicity, Face, Female, Humans, Infant, Learning, Male, Mothers, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Speech Acoustics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review