Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism and regulation of protein degradation in liver

Mortimore, Glenn E., Reeta Pösö, A., Lardeux, Bernard R.·1989·Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews

Abstract

The degradation of intracellular protein and other cytoplasmic macromolecules in liver is an ongoing process that regulates cytoplasmic mass and provides amino acids for energy and other metabolic uses early in starvation. Cellular proteins are conveniently divided into two general classes according to readily discernable differences in average rates of turnover. A short-lived class, having a half-life of approximately 10 min, comprises about 0.6% of total protein. Its degradation is not physiologically controlled, and the mechanism is probably nonlysosomal in nature. The second or long-lived group, with an average half-life 250 times greater, constitutes more than 99% of the cell's protein. By contrast, its breakdown is strongly regulated, and the site of catabolism is believed to be the vacuolar-lysosomal system. Cytoplasmic sequestration by lysosomes can be divided into two categories; macro- and microautophagy. The first is induced by amino acid and/or insulin deprivation. Amino acids are considered to be primary regulators, since they can control this process over the full range of induced proteolysis in the absence of hormones. Glucagon, cyclic AMP, and beta-agonists also stimulate macroautophagy in hepatocytes but have opposite effects in myocytes. Micrautophagy differs from the former in that the cytoplasmic "bite" is smaller and the uptake process is not acutely regulated. However, the latter does decrease during starvation in parallel with basal proteolysis, effects that might be linked to the loss of endoplasmic reticulum. The primary control of macroautophagy is accomplished through a small group of direct regulators (Leu, Tyr/Phe, Gln, Pro, Met, His, and Trp) and a specific coregulatory action of alanine. As a group, regulatory amino acids produce direct inhibitory responses in the perfused rat liver that are identical to those of the complete amino acid mixture at 0.5x and 4x (times) normal plasma concentrations. However, they lose effectiveness almost completely within a narrow zone centered at normal levels, a loss that can be abolished by the addition of alanine at its normal plasma concentration (0.5 mM). At this level, alanine does not inhibit directly. Interestingly, this zonal loss is also eliminated by insulin. Glucagon, though, specifically blocks the initial inhibition evoked by 0.5x amino acid mixtures and thus induces maximal rates of protein degradation at normal amino acid concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dmr.5610050105

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Mortimore, G. E., Reeta Pösö, A., & Lardeux, B. R.
Venue
Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
49-70
ISSN
  • 0742-4221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0895
OpenAlex
W2000622138
Cited by
223
References
2
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism and regulation of protein degradation in liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/dmr.5610050105
The paper
Mortimore, G. E., Reeta Pösö, A., & Lardeux, B. R. (1989). Mechanism and regulation of protein degradation in liver. Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmr.5610050105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.