Cited by 174Retinal Development and DisordersNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

Ganglion cell regeneration following whole-retina destruction in zebrafish

Open access
Sherpa, Tshering, Fimbel, Shane M., Mallory, Dianne E., Maaswinkel, Hans, Spritzer, Scott D., Sand, Jordan A., Li, L., Hyde, David R. +1 more·2008·Developmental Neurobiology

Abstract

The retinas of adult teleost fish can regenerate neurons following injury. The current study provides the first documentation of functional whole retina regeneration in the zebrafish, Danio rerio , following intraocular injection of the cytotoxin, ouabain. Loss and replacement of laminated retinal tissue was monitored by analysis of cell death and cell proliferation, and by analysis of retina‐specific gene expression patterns. The spatiotemporal process of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) regeneration was followed through the use of selective markers, and was found to largely recapitulate the spatiotemporal process of embryonic ganglion cell neurogenesis, over a more protracted time frame. However, the re‐expression of some ganglion cell markers was not observed. The growth and pathfinding of ganglion cell axons was evaluated by measurement of the optic nerve head (ONH), and the restoration of normal ONH size was found to correspond to the time of recovery of two visually‐mediated behaviors. However, some abnormalities were noted, including overproduction of RGCs, and progressive and excessive growth of the ONH at longer recovery times. This model system for whole‐retina regeneration has provided an informative view of the regenerative process. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol, 2008

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dneu.20568

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherpa, T., Fimbel, S. M., Mallory, D. E., Maaswinkel, H., Spritzer, S. D., Sand, J. A., Li, L., Hyde, D. R., & Stenkamp, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Stenkamp, Deborah L.
Venue
Developmental Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-13
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
166-181
ISSN
  • 1932-8451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-846X
OpenAlex
W2085375111
Cited by
174
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od018044-01)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY012146)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR016454)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Keywords
retinal ganglion cell regeneration, zebrafish, ouabain, retinal damage, optic nerve head, axon guidance, cell proliferation, cell death, retinal neurogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Biological Assay, Bromodeoxyuridine, Denervation, Nerve Regeneration, Neurotoxins, Optic Disk, Ouabain, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Time Factors, Vision, Ocular, Zebrafish, Biomarkers, Cell Death, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Recovery of Function, Growth Cones, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review