Cited by 123Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCounseling Practices and Supervision

In defense of dissemination of empirically supported psychological interventions.

Chambless, Dianne L.·1996·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

Misconceptions apparent in Garfield's comments on the report of the Division 12 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures are corrected. Issues concerning the use of manuals in psychotherapy training and practice and the value of specific treatments for specific problems are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00074.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambless, D. L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Chambless, Dianne L.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
1996
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
230-235
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2020751924
Cited by
123
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
empirically supported treatments, treatment manual, psychotherapy training, treatment specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review