Cited by 139Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Binge eating and other psychopathology in patients with type II diabetes mellitus

Crow, Scott, Kendall, David, Praus, Barbara, Thuras, Paul·2001·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Type II diabetes mellitus (DM), a common disease with many potential complications, is strongly associated with obesity. Alterations in food consumption can dramatically alter glucose control in individuals with Type II DM. Binge eating disorder (BED) is also closely associated with obesity. The nature of the relationship, if any, between Type II DM and BED is unclear. Methods: Forty‐three individuals (23 females, 20 males) with Type II DM were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV (SCID‐I), the Three‐Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), and the Impact of Weight Scale. The most recent hemoglobin A1c level was recorded. Height and weight were also measured. Results: Eleven subjects (25.6%) were diagnosed with BED. Individuals with BED had higher body mass index (BMI) scores, higher TFEQ Disinhibition and Hunger scores, and higher scores on all Impact of Weight subscales (except eating) compared with those without BED. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels did not differ between the two groups (8.1% vs. 8.4%; p = 0.553). Discussion: Rates of BED in subjects with Type II DM were substantial. Other types of psychopathology were also common. Although glycosylated hemoglobin levels were similar in patients with and without BED, the presence of BED was associated with greater obesity. Assessment for BED is an important aspect of the management of patients with Type II DM. © 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 30: 222–226, 2001.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.1077

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crow, S., Kendall, D., Praus, B., & Thuras, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • IQVIA (United States) (US)
  • Minneapolis VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Crow, Scott
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
222-226
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W1963674689
Cited by
139
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30 DK 50456, P30DK050456)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
binge eating disorder, type 2 diabetes, obesity, psychopathology, disinhibition, hunger, body mass index, HbA1c, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bulimia, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review