Cited by 121Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal

Open access
Fairburn, Christopher G., Rothwell, Emily R.·2015·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Smartphone applications (apps) are proliferating and health‐related apps are particularly popular. The aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate the clinical utility of apps designed either for people with eating disorders or for eating disorder professionals. Method: A search of the major app stores identified 805 potentially relevant apps, of which 39 were primarily designed for people with eating disorders and five for professionals. Results: The apps for people with eating disorders had four main functions. Most common was the provision of advice, the quality of which ranged from sound to potentially harmful. Five apps included self‐assessment tools but only two used methods that would generally be viewed as reliable. Four apps had the self‐monitoring of eating habits as a major feature. Entering information into these apps could be accomplished with varying degrees of ease, but viewing it was more difficult. One app allowed the transfer of information between patients and clinicians. Discussion: The enthusiasm for apps outstrips the evidence supporting their use. Given their popularity, it is suggested that clinicians evaluate app use as part of routine assessment. The clinical utility of the existing apps is not clear. Some are capable of tracking key features over time, but none has the functions required for analytic self‐monitoring as in cognitive behavioral treatments. The full potential of apps has yet to be realized. Specialized apps could be designed to augment various forms of treatment, and there is the possibility that they could deliver an entire personalized intervention. © 2015 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:1038–1046)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22398

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]research2guidance. Mobile Health Market Report 2013–2017: The Commercialization of mHealth Applications, Vol. 3 Berlin: research2 guidance, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fairburn, C. G., & Rothwell, E. R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-27
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
1038-1046
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W1558741031
Cited by
121
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (094585)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile application, eating disorders, health apps, clinical utility, self-monitoring, self-assessment tool, patient-clinician communication, cognitive behavioral therapy, personalized interventions, app quality
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review