Cited by 119Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence

Open access
Lonergan, Alexandra R., Bussey, Kay, Fardouly, Jasmine, Griffiths, Scott, Murray, Stuart B., Hay, Phillipa, Mond, Jonathan, Trompeter, Nora +1 more·2020·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: This study examined whether social media behaviors were associated with higher odds of meeting criteria for an eating disorder and whether gender moderated these relationships. Method: Australian adolescents (N = 4,209; 53.15% girls) completed the self‐report photo investment and manipulation scales. Additional self‐report items assessed avoidance of posting selfies and investment in others' selfies. Eating disorders were identified by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and other self‐report measures aligned with diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders‐5 criteria. Results: A multinomial logistic regression examining the effect of avoidance of posting selfies, photo investment, photo manipulation, and investment in others' selfies on the likelihood of meeting criteria for an eating disorder, compared to no disorder, was significant (χ2[42] = 1,128.93, p < .001). Greater avoidance was associated with higher odds of meeting criteria for all disorders except clinical/subclinical binge‐eating disorder and purging disorder. Increased photo investment was related to greater odds of meeting criteria for all disorders. A similar relationship emerged for photo manipulation, with the exception of clinical/subclinical binge‐eating disorder, and unspecified feeding and eating disorder. Investment in others' selfies was associated with higher odds of meeting criteria for all disorders except clinical/subclinical anorexia nervosa and purging disorder. There was a significant interaction between gender and avoidance (χ2[1] = 5.23, p = .025, OR = 1.74), whereby boys were more likely to meet criteria for clinical/subclinical anorexia nervosa in the context of greater avoidance of posting selfies. Discussion: Appearance‐related social media behaviors may be indicative of eating disorder risk. Implications for clinicians and advancements for social media screening tools are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23256

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teens who regularly post selfies and use photo manipulation tools have a higher prevalence of eating disorders, including male youth who are often underrepresented in other data sets.

    “Among teens who regularly post selfies and use photo manipulation tools, there is a higher prevalence of youth with eating disorders, including male youth who are often underrepresented in other data sets.304”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [304]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that greater photo manipulation was associated with higher odds of meeting criteria for several eating disorders in a sample that included adolescent boys. However, the paper measures photo investment and avoidance of posting selfies, not regular selfie posting as the claim states; the manipulation association also has exceptions. Its discussion of the few prior studies examining males supports their underrepresentation in research broadly, but does not establish underrepresentation in other data sets specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies included in the current review provide preliminary empirical support for individual-level moderators that should be investigated in future work, such as social comparison tendencies, investment in appearance, sensitivity to peer feedback, and levels of imaginary audience ideation.

    “Several studies included in the current review provide preliminary empirical support for individual-level moderators that should be investigated in future work, such as social comparison tendencies (Fardouly et al., 2015; Kleemans et al., 2018), investment in appearance (Lonergan et al., 2020; Nesi et al., 2021), sensitivity to peer feedback (Lee et al., 2020), and levels of imaginary audience ide”

    From The Perfect Storm: A Developmental-Sociocultural Framework for the Role of Social Media in Adolescent Girls' Body Image Concerns and Mental Health. (2022) · cites this paper as Lonergan et al., 2020

    The Abstract reports that greater photo investment was associated with higher odds of meeting criteria for an eating disorder, providing preliminary evidence relevant to investment in appearance. But the study examined photo investment as a social media behavior, not as an individual-level moderator; it does not establish the moderating role attributed to it here. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies find a clear association between appearance-related social media behaviors and eating disorders in adolescents.

    “Studies are finding a clear association between appearance-related social media behaviors and eating disorders in teens.304”
  • Australian adolescents who reported greater photo investment were more likely to meet criteria for eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, and among girls in the U.S., experience poorer body esteem.

    “Furthermore, recent research found that Australian adolescents who reported greater photo investment (e.g., concern about numbers of 'likes') were more likely to meet criteria for eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa (Lonergan et al., 2020), and, among girls in the U.S., experience poorer body esteem (Nesi et al., 2021).”
  • Five cross-sectional studies yielded statistically significant associations between social media usage and various clinical eating disorders, including night eating syndrome, binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa.

    “Five cross-sectional studies yielded statistically significant associations between social media usage and various clinical eating disorders. These ranged from night eating syndrome [67], to binge eating disorder [68] and bulimia nervosa [69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fairburn C. G., 2008, Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lonergan, A. R., Bussey, K., Fardouly, J., Griffiths, S., Murray, S. B., Hay, P., Mond, J., Trompeter, N., & Mitchison, D.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Lonergan, Alexandra R.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-07
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
755-766
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W3014799226
Cited by
117
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1121538)
  • Macquarie University (X 16322420)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
eating disorders, adolescents, selfies, social media use, photo manipulation, gender differences, anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder, purging disorder, eating disorder screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Self Report, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review