Cited by 209Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Me, my selfie, and I: The relationship between editing and posting selfies and body dissatisfaction in men and women.

Open access
Lonergan, Alexandra Rhodes, Bussey, Kay, Mond, Jonathan, Brown, Olivia, Griffiths, Scott, Murray, Stuart B., Mitchison, Deborah·2019·Body Image

Abstract

Factors that promote versus protect against body dissatisfaction remain unclear. Social media may be a risk factor, particularly given ubiquitous engagement among young people, and the pervasive use of "selfies." Conversely, self-compassion has received attention as a protective factor against body dissatisfaction. This study examined: (a) the relationships between "manipulation" of selfies posted online, "investment" in others' responses to selfies, and body dissatisfaction; and (b) whether self-compassion moderated the relationships between social media variables and body dissatisfaction. Results from 184 Australian men (n = 89) and women (n = 95) suggested that social media variables photo manipulation and investment were associated with greater body dissatisfaction for both genders. Self-compassion did not moderate these relationships. Findings suggest that manipulation and concern about selfies posted may be risk correlates for body dissatisfaction in men and women. Further research is needed to investigate protective factors against body dissatisfaction in an online environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.12.001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lonergan, A. R., Bussey, K., Mond, J., Brown, O., Griffiths, S., Murray, S. B., & Mitchison, D.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lonergan, Alexandra Rhodes
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
28
Pages
39-43
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905580396
Cited by
209
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 9
FWCI
29.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
selfies, body dissatisfaction, image editing, social media, self-compassion, gender differences, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Photography, Self Concept, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review