Cited by 30Eating Disorders and BehaviorsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Examining the self-reported advantages and disadvantages of socially networking about body image and eating disorders.

Open access
Cavazos‐Rehg, Patricia A., Fitzsimmons‐Craft, Ellen E., Krauss, Melissa J., Anako, Nnenna, Xu, Christine, Kasson, Erin, Costello, Shaina J., Wilfley, Denise E.·2020·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to understand the self-reported advantages and disadvantages of socially networking about body image/eating disorders (EDs) and to examine the openness of these participants to online outreach and support for ED symptoms. METHOD: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a sample of N = 598. Eligible participants were ≥15 years old, English-speaking, and U.S. residents who endorsed posting or following thin-ideal/body-image content on social media. Quantitative measures were used to assess online peer support and online interaction preferences, and to identify ED symptoms. Deductive and inductive qualitative approaches were used to analyze open-ended items about the advantages and disadvantages of social networking about thin-ideal content on social media platforms (SMPs). RESULTS: Among those who posted about the thin-ideal on social media, 70% felt that the peer responses were positive and supportive. Participants generally favored online interaction, and a third stated that they would accept support from someone they did not know online (38%). The most common advantages noted for posting/following thin-ideal content on SMPs were motivation/encouragement to engage in a certain behavior, socializing, and information giving/seeking. The most common disadvantages mentioned for posting/following thin-ideal content on SMPs were that the content elicits negative/bad feelings, having to deal with the negative consequences/reactions of others when socially networking about this topic, and that it triggers a desire to engage in ED behaviors. DISCUSSION: With these findings, researchers, health practitioners, and social media administrators can devise ways to reduce harmful consequences of posting/following body-image/ED content on social media.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23282

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A mixed methods study concluded that the #thinspiration hashtag glorified 'emaciated people' and 'bone-thin girls', promoting starvation as a lifestyle choice instead of a symptom of mental illness.

    “A mixed methods study concluded that the hashtag glorified “emaciated people” and “bone-thin girls”, promoting starvation as a lifestyle choice instead of a symptom of mental illness.”

    From The social media diet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says social-media content can glamorize and encourage disordered eating, including through “thinspiration” material. The paper does not report a conclusion about the #thinspiration hashtag, use the quoted descriptions “emaciated people” or “bone-thin girls,” or characterize starvation as a lifestyle choice rather than a symptom of mental illness. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A mixed-methods study found that only 3% of 499 participants with clinical/subclinical eating disorders used social media to aid recovery or as a form of treatment, and the remaining 97% indicated that it hampered recovery.

    “A mixed-methods study found that only 3% of 499 participants with clinical/subclinical eating disorders used social media to aid recovery or as a form of treatment. The remaining 97% indicated that it hampered recovery”

    From The social media diet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results (Sample characteristics; Advantages of socially networking, page unavailable) report 598 participants, of whom 83.4% screened positive for a clinical or subclinical eating disorder, and say 2.90% of respondents mentioned recovery or treatment as a motivation. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes recovery-related motivation as uncommon. But the paper does not say the remaining 97% felt social media hampered recovery; its Results report several different perceived disadvantages, not a 97% recovery-harm finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavazos‐Rehg, P. A., Fitzsimmons‐Craft, E. E., Krauss, M. J., Anako, N., Xu, C., Kasson, E., Costello, S. J., & Wilfley, D. E.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Cavazos‐Rehg, Patricia A.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-02
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
852-863
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W3023272597
Cited by
30
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K02 DA043657)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08 MH120341, R21 MH112331, R34 MH119170)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
body image, eating disorders, thin ideal, social media, online peer support, social networking, digital outreach, eating disorder symptoms, social networking sites
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Internet, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Self Report, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review