Cited by 186Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorImpact of Technology on Adolescents

A pilot evaluation of a social media literacy intervention to reduce risk factors for eating disorders

Open access
McLean, Siân A., Wertheim, Eleanor H., Masters, Jennifer, Paxton, Susan J.·2017·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study investigated the effectiveness of a social media literacy intervention for adolescent girls on risk factors for eating disorders. Method: A quasi‐experimental pre‐ to post‐test design comparing intervention and control conditions was used. Participants were 101 adolescent girls (M age = 13.13, SD = 0.33) who were allocated to receive three social media literacy intervention lessons (n = 64) or to receive classes as usual (n = 37). Self‐report assessments of eating disorder risk factors were completed one week prior to, and one week following the intervention. Results: Significant group by time interaction effects revealed improvements in the intervention condition relative to the control condition for body image (body esteem–weight; d = .19), disordered eating (dietary restraint; d = .26) and media literacy (realism scepticism; d = .32). Discussion: The outcomes of this pilot study suggest that social media literacy is a potentially useful approach for prevention of risk for eating disorders in adolescent girls in the current social media environment of heightened vulnerability. Replication of this research with larger, randomized controlled trials, and longer follow‐up is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22708

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLean, S. A., Wertheim, E. H., Masters, J., & Paxton, S. J.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
McLean, Siân A.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-28
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
847-851
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2611212970
Cited by
186
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
La Trobe University Building Healthy Communities Research Focus Area
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media literacy, eating disorders, eating disorder risk factors, adolescent girls, body image, body esteem, dietary restraint, disordered eating, media literacy, prevention interventions
MeSH terms
Literacy, Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Pilot Projects, Risk Factors, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review