Cited by 7Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Moving from “I know it when I see it” to an empirical classification of severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: Commentary on Wonderlich et al. (2020)

Wildes, Jennifer E.·2020·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (SE‐AN) is well known to clinicians who treat eating disorders, especially in adults, yet an empirically validated definition of SE‐AN is lacking. Current approaches to delineating SE‐AN rely on expert opinion, and there is little consensus regarding the criteria that distinguish SE‐AN from other clinical presentations or the thresholds that define the boundaries of severity and enduringness. Empirical classification techniques and clinical staging frameworks that incorporate biomarkers offer intriguing alternatives to expert consensus in refining the definition of SE‐AN. Empirical approaches, such as latent class analysis and taxometric analysis, have contributed to advances in eating disorders classification, including support for distinctions between eating disorder classes. Likewise, clinical staging models are being applied to other psychiatric disorders and offer a framework for incorporating biological indices of illness progression, such as neurocognitive changes, into a definition of SE‐AN. Though some of these methods (e.g., biomarkers) are a long way from being realized, the need for an evidence‐based approach to classifying SE‐AN is clear. Without it, the challenges outlined by Wonderlich et al. (International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2020) will be difficult to resolve, and the burden of SE‐AN on patients, their loved ones, and the healthcare system will continue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23321

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SEED and SE-AN have not been validated for clinical use or formally recognized as psychiatric diagnoses by ICD-11 or DSM-5-TR.

    “They have not been validated for clinical use or formally recognized as a psychiatric diagnosis by the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) (105, 108–112).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wildes, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Wildes, Jennifer E.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-04
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
1315-1317
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W3032309292
Cited by
7
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
severe and enduring anorexia nervosa, anorexia nervosa, eating disorder classification, empirical classification, latent class analysis, taxometric analysis, clinical staging, biomarkers, disease severity, disease duration, adult anorexia nervosa
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review