Cited by 92Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMental Health and PsychiatryPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Classification challenges in the field of eating disorders: can severe and enduring anorexia nervosa be better defined

Open access
Hay, Phillipa, Touyz, Stephen·2018·Journal of Eating Disorders

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40337-018-0229-8

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SEED and SE-AN have not been validated for clinical use or formally recognized as psychiatric diagnoses by ICD-11 or DSM-5-TR.

    “They have not been validated for clinical use or formally recognized as a psychiatric diagnosis by the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) (105, 108–112).”

    From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [105]

    The paper’s main text (page unavailable) says there are no agreed criteria for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) and proposes criteria for testing, supporting the point that its clinical definition is not established. It does not assess validation of the broader category SEED or address formal recognition in DSM-5-TR; its discussion refers to DSM-5 and ICD-11. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hay, P., & Touyz, S.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hay, Phillipa
Venue
Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2018-12
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
41-41
ISSN
2050-2974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901986061
Cited by
92
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, severe and enduring anorexia nervosa, eating disorder classification, diagnostic criteria, disease classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review