The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation
Abstract
Participation of citizens, groups, organizations and businesses is now an essential element to tackle climate change effectively at international, European Union, national and local levels. However, beyond the general imperative to participate, major policy bodies offer little guidance on what this entails. We suggest that the dominance of Arnstein's ladder of citizen participation in policy discourses constrains the ways we think about, and critically the purposes we ascribe to, participation in a climate change context. We suggest an alternative framing of climate change, where no single group has clear access to understanding the issue and its resolution. Thus adaptation is fundamentally dependent on new forms of learning. Drawing on experiences of social learning approaches to natural resource managing, we explore how a commitment to social learning more accurately embodies the new kinds of role, relationship, practice and sense of purpose required to progress adaptive climate change agendas and practices. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology
Schön, D. A. (1995) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673 · Cited by 861
Cited by
A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science
Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008 · Cited by 819
Transformational adaptation: agriculture and climate change
Rickards, L., & Howden, S. M. (2012) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp11172 · Cited by 417
Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Rognli, J. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001 · Cited by 366
de Vente, J., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Valente, S., & Newig, J. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08053-210224 · Cited by 334
Values, rules and knowledge: Adaptation as change in the decision context
Gorddard, R., Colloff, M. J., Wise, R. M., Ware, D., & Dunlop, M. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.004 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, K., & Ison, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Policy and Governance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 358-373
- ISSN
- 1756-932X (ISSN-L)
- 1756-9338
- OpenAlex
- W2101082367
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eet.523
- The paper
- Collins, K., & Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.