Cited by 24Cardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without diabetes in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial

Open access
MacDonald, Michael R., She, Lilin, Doenst, Torsten, Binkley, Philip F., Rouleau, Jean L., Tan, Ru-San, Lee, Kerry L., Miller, Alan B. +10 more·2015·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

AIMS: Hypothesis 1 of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial enrolled 1212 patients with an LVEF of ≤35% and CAD amenable to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients were randomized to CABG and optimal medical therapy (MED) or MED alone. The objective was to assess whether or not patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the STICH trial would have greater benefit from CABG than patients without DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: The characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with and without DM randomized to CABG and MED or MED alone were compared. DM was present in 40%. At baseline, patients with DM had more triple vessel CAD, higher LVEF, and smaller left ventricular volumes. In patients with DM, the primary outcome of all-cause mortality occurred in 39% of patients in the MED group and 39% in the CABG group [hazard ratio (HR) with CABG 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.26]. In patients without DM, the primary outcome occurred in 41% of patients in the MED group and 32% in the CABG group (HR with CABG 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.02). While numerically it would appear that the treatment effect of CABG is blunted in patients with DM, there was no significant interaction between DM and treatment group on formal statistical testing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DM enrolled in the STICH trial had more triple vessel disease, smaller hearts, and higher LVEF than those without DM. CABG did not exert greater benefit in patients with DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejhf.288

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDonald, M. R., She, L., Doenst, T., Binkley, P. F., Rouleau, J. L., Tan, R.-S., Lee, K. L., Miller, A. B., Sopko, G., Szalewska, D., Waclawiw, M. A., Dabrowski, R., Castelvecchio, S., Adlbrecht, C., Michler, R. E., Oh, J. K., Velazquez, E. J., & Petrie, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Changi General Hospital (SG)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • National Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
  • Institute of Cardiology , Warsaw ,
  • IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (IT)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
MacDonald, Michael R.
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2015-05-26
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
725-734
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2098199229
Cited by
24
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL69015, U01HL69013)
  • National Institutes of Health (NCT00023595)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart failure, coronary artery bypass grafting, optimal medical therapy, STICH trial, all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, three-vessel coronary artery disease, treatment effect heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Myocardial Ischemia, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review