The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tissue‐specific migration pathways by phenotypically distinct subpopulations of memory T cells
Abstract
A proportion of T cells recirculate in a tissue‐selective manner. Recent studies which showed that the skin‐tropic subset of T cells was of memory/activated type, led us to examine whether the preferential homing of T cells to the gut also involved memory T cells, and if so whether these memory T cells were phenotypically distinct from other memory T cells. Lymphocytes migrating through the gut and the skin of sheep was collected by cannulating the lymphatic ducts draining these tissues. Both naive and memory T cells were found to recirculate through the gut, although only memory T cells migrated through the skin. However, when T cells from the gut were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate and assessed for their migration back to the gut, it was the memory population which showed a tropism for the gut. Gut‐tropic memory T cells migrated poorly through the skin, indicating that these cells were distinct from skin‐tropic memory T cells. This was confirmed by phenotypic analysis. Gut memory T cells expressed very low levels of the α6 and β1 integrins, in contrast to skin memory T cells which expressed high levels. There was no evidence for heterogeneity within the naive T cell population, which migrated preferentially to lymph nodes. This migration pattern could be explained in part by the high expression of the L‐selectin (lymph node homing receptor, LAM‐1) on naive T cells, in contrast to memory T cells from gut or skin which were mostly L‐selectin negative. These results in sheep indicate that subsets of α/β memory T cells show tissue‐selective migration patterns, which probably develop in a particular environment following encounter with antigen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human epidermal T cells predominantly belong to the lineage expressing alpha/beta T cell receptor.
Foster, C. A., Yokozeki, H., Rappersberger, K., Koning, F., Volc-Platzer, B., Rieger, A., Coligan, J. E., Wolff, K., & Stingl, G. (1990) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.171.4.997 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Tissue-resident memory T cells: local specialists in immune defence
Mueller, S. N., & Mackay, L. K. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2015.3 · Cited by 1,006
The emerging role of resident memory T cells in protective immunity and inflammatory disease
Park, C. O., & Kupper, T. S. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3883 · Cited by 517
T cells and the skin: from protective immunity to inflammatory skin disorders
Ho, A. W., & Kupper, T. S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0162-3 · Cited by 241
Homeostasis and Durability of T-Cell Memory—The Resting and the Restless T-Cell Memory
Radbruch, A., McGrath, M. A., Siracusa, F., Hoffmann, U., Sercan-Alp, Ö., Hutloff, A., Tokoyoda, K., Chang, H.-D., & Dong, J. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a038083 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackay, C. R., Marston, W. L., Dudler, L., Spertini, O., Tedder, T. F., & Hein, W. R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 887-895
- ISSN
- 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4141
- OpenAlex
- W1973833139
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tissue‐specific migration pathways by phenotypically distinct subpopulations of memory T cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eji.1830220402
- The paper
- Mackay, C. R., Marston, W. L., Dudler, L., Spertini, O., Tedder, T. F., & Hein, W. R. (1992). Tissue‐specific migration pathways by phenotypically distinct subpopulations of memory T cells. European Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830220402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.