The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of processing requirements and metal cross‐reactivities in T cell clones from patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel
Abstract
Metal ions such as nickel, cobalt, copper and palladium are known to be potent sensitizers in humans, but the antigenic determinants created by these metals as well as the mechanisms of recognition by specific T cell clones are still not elucidated. In this paper, nickel‐specific T lymphocyte clones were isolated from four patients exhibiting contact dermatitis to this metal. A panel of 42 independent T cell clones was studied. They were shown to recognize nickel in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules and to belong to the CD4 subset. Using fixed autologous Epstein‐Barr virus‐transformed B cells as antigen‐presenting cells (APC), we could distinguish two distinct groups of T cell clones on the basis of processing requirements: 40% of the T cell clones were strictly processing dependent, whereas the remaining 60% could proliferate in response to nickel even in the presence of glutaraldehyde‐fixed APC. Furthermore, we present arguments indicating that individual Ni‐specific T cell clones cross‐react with some transition metals (e.g. Cu or Pd), but not with others (e.g. Co, Cr and Pt), presented by identical MHC class II molecules. These results thus provide an explanation for the multiple metal‐reactivities observed in vivo in human patients: they indicate that for Cu and Pd, these co‐reactivities in vivo might be due to cross‐reactivity at the clonal level. Our findings also suggest that this is not the case for cobalt allergy, which might result from co‐sensitization of the patient to cobalt in addition to nickel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal Sensitivity in Patients with Orthopaedic Implants
Hallab, N., Merritt, K., & Jacobs, J. J. (2001) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200103000-00017 · Cited by 935
Allergic Contact Dermatitis––Formation, Structural Requirements, and Reactivity of Skin Sensitizers
Karlberg, A.-T., Bergström, M. A., Börje, A., Luthman, K., & Nilsson, J. L. G. (2008) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx7002239 · Cited by 287
Direct, MHC-dependent presentation of the drug sulfamethoxazole to human alphabeta T cell clones.
Schnyder, B., Mauri-Hellweg, D., Zanni, M., Bettens, F., & Pichler, W. J. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci119505 · Cited by 281
Role of Drug Disposition in Drug Hypersensitivity: A Chemical, Molecular, and Clinical Perspective
Park, B. K., Pirmohamed, M., & Kitteringham, N. R. (1998) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx980058f · Cited by 267
Fage, S. W., Faurschou, A., & Thyssen, J. P. (2014) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.12273 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulon, C., Vollmer, J., & Weltzien, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3308-3315
- ISSN
- 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4141
- OpenAlex
- W2164716707
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of processing requirements and metal cross‐reactivities in T cell clones from patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eji.1830251216
- The paper
- Moulon, C., Vollmer, J., & Weltzien, H. (1995). Characterization of processing requirements and metal cross‐reactivities in T cell clones from patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel. European Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830251216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.