Cited by 28Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Exposure and cognitive‐behavioural therapy for chronic back pain: An RCT on treatment processes

Schemer, Lea, Schroeder, Andreas, Ørnbøl, Eva, Glombiewski, Julia Anna·2019·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background To improve treatment outcomes, it is essential to understand the processes involved in therapeutic change. The aim of this study was to investigate the processes involved in treatment of individuals with chronic lower back pain (CLBP) and high fear-avoidance. Graded in vivo exposure (Exposure), a specific treatment, and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), a general treatment, were compared. Methods Our study used data from a three-arm randomized controlled trial. The sample comprised 61 CLBP patients (pain duration >3 months; sufficient level of fear-avoidance). Assessments of session-by-session processes were done weekly for a maximum 14 weeks. The primary outcome, functional disability, was assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment and 6-months follow-up. First, two-level models were used to test for treatment-related similarities and differences in the changes in session-by-session measures (i.e., common and unique treatment processes respectively). Second, we analysed treatment processes as predictors of treatment outcome. Results Contrary to our expectations, we found no evidence of unique treatment processes. Our results indicate that Exposure and CBT share some treatment processes. Specifically, patients reported a reduction in fear of movement and improvements in their ability to relax, to distract themselves, to manage their pain, to confront feared movements, to be active and to enjoy things despite their pain. Changes in fear of movement, relaxation, di…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1326

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior RCTs of GET in adults utilized monodisciplinary treatment controls of CBT, Graded Activity, PT, or manual therapy, in contrast to a multidisciplinary treatment control.

    “we identified that prior RCTs utilized monodiscliplinary treatment controls of CBT[49], Graded Activity[73], PT[16], or manual therapy[1], in contrast to a multidisciplinary treatment control.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schemer, L., Schroeder, A., Ørnbøl, E., & Glombiewski, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Schemer, Lea
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-04
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
526-538
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2897198644
Cited by
28
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG‐GL 607)
  • Philipps-Universität Marburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
chronic low back pain, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment process, fear-avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, functional disability, pain management, relaxation, distraction
MeSH terms
Adult, Avoidance Learning, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Self Efficacy, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review