The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social identification and permeability of group boundaries
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate some of the factors affecting social identification. In Experiment 1 ingroup identification was measured for subjects who were members of high or low status groups with either permeable or impermeable boundaries, and who received high, average or low ability feedback. The main results are that (1) members of high status groups show more ingroup identification than members of low status groups (2) members of low status groups with permeable boundaries identify less with their group than members of low status groups with impermeable boundaries and (3) in low status groups ingroup identification decreases as group members have higher individual ability. In Experiment 2, in addition to manipulating group status and individual ability, permeability was further differentiated into separate possibilities for upward and downward mobility. The most important results of Experiment 2 are that (1) members of high status groups show more ingroup identification than members of low status groups and (2) group members with high individual ability identify less with their group when upward mobility is possible than when upward mobility is not possible. These results are discussed in relation to social identity theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Downward comparison principles in social psychology
Wills, T. A. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 · Cited by 2,705
Cited by
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000058 · Cited by 532
Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., & George, E. (2004) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159028 · Cited by 362
Sidanius, J., Van Laar, C., Levin, S., & Sinclair, S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.96 · Cited by 183
Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
Contending With Stereotype Threat at Work: A Model of Long-Term Responses 1Ψ7
Block, C. J., Koch, S. M., Liberman, B. E., Merriweather, T. J., & Roberson, L. (2011) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000010382459 · Cited by 128
Liu, X., & Zhao, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146559 · Cited by 63
Accounting for unequal access to higher education: The role of social identity factors
Nieuwenhuis, M., Manstead, A. S. R., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430219829824 · Cited by 45
Identities in Context: How Social Class Shapes Inequalities in Education
Easterbrook, M. J., Hadden, I. R., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2019) · The Social Psychology of Inequality · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_7 · Cited by 29
KRENDL, A. C., MAGOON, N. S., HULL, J. G., & HEATHERTON, T. F. (2011) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00824.x · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., De Vries, N., & Wilke, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 497-513
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2092073050
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
