Cited by 362Social and Intergroup PsychologyJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeam Dynamics and Performance

Identifying the Ingroup: A Closer Look at the Influence of Demographic Dissimilarity on Employee Social Identity

Chattopadhyay, Prithviraj, Tluchowska, Malgorzata, George, Elizabeth·2004·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Relational demography researchers have constructed models based on social identity theory and self-categorization theory, without fully incorporating their theoretical and empirical richness. We rectify this omission by constructing a model that includes key concepts from these theories and that predicts whether employees will identify with a particular demographic category or with their workgroup, or both. Propositions derived examine whether demographic dissimilarity will positively or negatively influence employee social identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20159028

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals from historically subordinated social groups typically resolve identity conflict by adapting to the extant culture.

    “They resolve an identity conflict by adapting to the extant culture, a fairly typical response for individuals from historically subordinated social groups (e.g., Chattopadhyay et al., 2004;Derks et al., 2006).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Chattopadhyay et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., & George, E.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
180
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166734984
Cited by
362
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
FWCI
34.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
demographic dissimilarity, social identity theory, self-categorization theory, relational demography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review