The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezo‐transducers
Abstract
Although structural mechanical impedance is a direct representation of the structural parameters, its measurement is difficult at high frequencies owing to practical considerations. This paper presents a new method of damage diagnosis by means of changes in the structural mechanical impedance at high frequencies. The mechanical impedance is extracted from the electro‐mechanical admittance signatures of piezoelectric‐ceramic (PZT) patches surface bonded to the structure using the electro‐mechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The main feature of the newly developed approach is that both the real as well as the imaginary component of the admittance signature is used in damage quantification. A complex damage metric is proposed to quantify damage parametrically based on the extracted structural parameters, i.e. the equivalent single degree of freedom (SDOF) stiffness, the mass, and the damping associated with the drive point of the PZT patch. The proposed scheme eliminates the need for any a priori information about the phenomenological nature of the structure or any ‘model’ of the structural system. As proof of concept, the paper reports a damage diagnosis study conducted on a model reinforced concrete (RC) frame subjected to base vibrations on a shaking table. The proposed methodology was found to perform better than the existing damage quantification approaches, i.e. the low‐frequency vibration methods as well as the traditional raw‐signature based damage quantification in the EMI technique. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data
Xia, Y., Hao, H., Brownjohn, J. M. W., & Xia, P. (2002) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.137 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Park, G., Farrar, C. R., Scalea, F. L. D., & Coccia, S. (2006) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/020 · Cited by 264
Material approaches to stretchable strain sensors
Park, J., You, I., Shin, S., & Jeong, U. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201402810 · Cited by 216
Kim, J.-T., Park, J.-H., Hong, D.-S., & Park, W.-S. (2010) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.021 · Cited by 115
Parida, L., Moharana, S., Ferreira, V. M., Giri, S. K., & Ascensão, G. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22249920 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhalla, S., & Kiong Soh, C.
- Venue
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-30
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1897-1916
- ISSN
- 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9845
- OpenAlex
- W2135994265
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.