Cited by 59Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health PracticesMental Health Treatment and Access

Stigma of eating disorders and recovery‐related outcomes: A systematic review

Foran, Aoife‐Marie, O'Donnell, Aisling T., Muldoon, Orla T.·2020·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Objective: People with eating disorders (EDs) tend to engage in behaviours that are ordinarily perceived as normal in society, such as restrictive dieting. However, when people are diagnosed with an ED, they may often feel stigmatized, which is likely to act as a barrier to recovery. To date, there is a limited understanding of how stigma of EDs impacts recovery‐related outcomes. Method: A systematic search was performed using PsychINFO and PubMed. Multiple combined searches of terms relating to stigma, EDs, and recovery‐related outcomes were conducted. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the selection process and resulted in nine studies meeting specific inclusion criteria. The extracted data are examined in a critical narrative synthesis. Results: Our review suggested that across different samples and measures, stigmatization of EDs is negatively related to a range of factors important for recovery. These include psychological, social and physical health outcomes, ED psychopathology and treatment‐seeking behaviours. Conclusions: Based on the quality assessment, it was concluded that future research would benefit from the use of research designs that can demonstrate causality and generalize findings across community samples. Therefore, in order to improve recovery‐related outcomes, treatment plans must consider the type of ED stigma experienced and its relation with specific recovery‐related outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2735

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foran, A., O'Donnell, A. T., & Muldoon, O. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • Centre for Social Issues Research, Department of Psychology University of Limerick Limerick Republic of Ireland
Corresponding author
Foran, Aoife‐Marie
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-26
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
385-397
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W3012959041
Cited by
59
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
eating disorders, stigma, recovery, treatment-seeking behavior, mental health outcomes, social functioning, physical health, psychopathology, barriers to recovery
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Stereotyping, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review