Cited by 49Eating Disorders and BehaviorsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The efficacy of virtual reality in the treatment of binge‐purging eating disorders: A meta‐analysis

Low, Tian Ling, Ho, Roger, Ho, Cyrus, Tam, Wilson·2021·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR)‐enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in the treatment of binge‐purging type eating disorders compared to CBT. Method: Four electronic literature databases were searched to retrieve eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses was used to select eligible studies. Meta‐analyses of extracted data were then conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Six RCTs totalling 297 participants were included. Results showed significantly larger decreases in the frequency of binges in participants who underwent VR‐enhanced CBT compared to CBT. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the change in body mass index or frequency of purges. Additionally, there were significantly larger decreases in situation‐induced body dissatisfaction in participants who underwent VR‐enhanced CBT compared to CBT, but no significant difference in improvement of overall body satisfaction. Conclusion: VR‐enhanced CBT shows greater efficacy than CBT in reducing situation‐induced body dissatisfaction and frequency of binges. Our results highlight the potential of VR in helping patients develop coping strategies to food/situational triggers. Future RCTs may benefit from recruiting more participants to reduce the impact of drop‐outs on outcome data and blinding post‐intervention assessors to reduce risk of bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2804

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, T. L., Ho, R., Ho, C., & Tam, W.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University Health System (SG)
Corresponding author
Ho, Roger
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-12
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
52-59
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W3105303187
Cited by
49
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
virtual reality, cognitive behavioral therapy, binge frequency, body dissatisfaction, body mass index, purging, treatment efficacy, dietary triggers
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Body Mass Index, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review