Cited by 86Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Brain region distribution and patterns of bioaccumulative perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and sulfonates in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus)

Greaves, Alana K., Letcher, Robert J., Sonne, Christian, Dietz, Rune·2013·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

The present study investigated the comparative accumulation of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in eight brain regions of polar bears (Ursus maritimus, n = 19) collected in 2006 from Scoresby Sound, East Greenland. The PFAAs studied were perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs, C(6) -C(15) chain lengths) and sulfonates (C(4) , C(6) , C(8) , and C(10) chain lengths) as well as selected precursors including perfluorooctane sulfonamide. On a wet-weight basis, blood-brain barrier transport of PFAAs occurred for all brain regions, although inner regions of the brain closer to incoming blood flow (pons/medulla, thalamus, and hypothalamus) contained consistently higher PFAA concentrations compared to outer brain regions (cerebellum, striatum, and frontal, occipital, and temporal cortices). For pons/medulla, thalamus, and hypothalamus, the most concentrated PFAAs were perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), ranging from 47 to 58 ng/g wet weight, and perfluorotridecanoic acid, ranging from 43 to 49 ng/g wet weight. However, PFOS and the longer-chain PFCAs (C(10) -C(15) ) were significantly (p < 0.002) positively correlated with lipid content for all brain regions. Lipid-normalized PFOS and PFCA (C(10) -C(15) ) concentrations were not significantly (p > 0.05) different among brain regions. The burden of the sum of PFCAs, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, and perfluorooctane sulfonamide in the brain (average mass, 392 g) was estimated to be 46 µg. The present study demonstrates that both PFCAs and perfluoroalkyl sulfonates cross the blood-brain barrier in polar bears and that wet-weight concentrations are brain region-specific.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.2107

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain stem, hypothalamus, and thalamus are some of the most highly perfused and lipid-rich brain regions, while the frontal and temporal cortex have lower lipid content and relatively low perfusion.

    “The brain stem, hypothalamus, and thalamus are some of the most highly perfused and lipid-rich brain regions, while the frontal and temporal cortex are characterized as having lower lipid content and relatively low perfusion (Cipolla, 2009; Greaves et al., 2013).”
  • Greaves et al. reported a positive correlation between longer chain perfluorinated carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and extractable lipid content in the brainstem and cerebellum.

    “Greaves et al. (2013) also reported a positive correlation between longer chain perfluorinated carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and extractable lipid content in the brainstem and cerebellum, hypothesizing that PFCAs with carbon chain lengths”
  • Due to the diversity of PFAS, perfluorinated compounds with varying chemical structures are likely to cross the blood-brain barrier through multiple mechanisms, which might result in different patterns of distribution in the CNS.

    “Due to the diversity of PFAS, perfluorinated compounds with varying chemical structures are likely to cross the BBB through multiple mechanisms, which might result in different patterns of distribution in the CNS (Greaves et al., 2013; Cao and Ng, 2021).”
  • In polar bear brains, the highest PFAS concentrations were reported in the hypothalamus, brain stem, thalamus, and cerebellum, whereas the lowest concentrations were observed in the cortex.

    “The highest concentrations of PFAS were reported in the hypothalamus, brain stem, thalamus, and cerebellum, whereas the lowest concentrations were observed in the cortex (Greaves et al., 2013; Eggers Pedersen et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greaves, A. K., Letcher, R. J., Sonne, C., & Dietz, R.
Affiliations
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Department of Bioscience, Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
Corresponding author
Letcher, Robert J.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
713-722
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2029026103
Cited by
86
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kommissionen for Videnskabelige Undersøgelser i Grønland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl carboxylates, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonamide, polar bear, brain tissue distribution, blood-brain barrier, bioaccumulation, marine mammal contaminants
MeSH terms
Animals, Ursidae, Brain, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Greenland, Male, Tissue Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review