Cited by 116Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Brain Region-specific Perfluoroalkylated Sulfonate (PFSA) and Carboxylic Acid (PFCA) Accumulation and Neurochemical Biomarker Responses in East Greenland Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus)

Eggers Pedersen, Kathrine, Basu, Niladri, Letcher, Robert, Greaves, Alana K., Sonne, Christian, Dietz, Rune, Styrishave, Bjarne·2015·Environmental Research

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) is a growing class of contaminants in the Arctic environment, and include the established perfluorinated sulfonates (PFSAs; especially perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)) and carboxylic acids (PFCAs). PFSAs and PFCAs of varying chain length have been reported to bioaccumulate in lipid rich tissues of the brain among other tissues such as liver, and can reach high concentrations in top predators including the polar bear. PFCA and PFSA bioaccummulation in the brain has the potential to pose neurotoxic effects and therefore we conducted a study to investigate if variations in neurochemical transmitter systems i.e. the cholinergic, glutaminergic, dopaminergic and GABAergic, could be related to brain-specific bioaccumulation of PFASs in East Greenland polar bears. Nine brain regions from nine polar bears were analyzed for enzyme activity (monoamine oxidase (MAO), acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and glutamine synthetase (GS)) and receptor density (dopamine-2 (D2), muscarinic cholinergic (mAChR) and gamma-butyric acid type A (GABA-A)) along with PFSA and PFCA concentrations. Average brain ∑PFSA concentration was 25ng/g ww where PFOS accounted for 91%. Average ∑PFCA concentration was 88ng/g ww where PFUnDA, PFDoDA and PFTrDA combined accounted for 79%. The highest concentrations of PFASs were measured in brain stem, cerebellum and hippocampus. Correlative analyses were performed both across and within brain regions. Significant positive correlations were found between PFASs and MAO activity in occipital lobe (e.g. ∑PFCA; rp=0.83, p=0.041, n=6) and across brain regions (e.g. ∑PFCA; rp=0.47, p=0.001, ∑PFSA; rp=0.44, p>0.001; n=50). GABA-A receptor density was positively correlated with two PFASs across brain regions (PFOS; rp=0.33, p=0.02 and PFDoDA; rp=0.34, p=0.014; n=52). Significant negative correlations were found between mAChR density and PFASs in cerebellum (e.g. ∑PFCA; rp=-0.95, p=0.013, n=5) and across brain regions (e.g. ∑PFCA; rp=-0.40, p=0.003, ∑PFSA; rp=-0.37, p=0.007; n=52). AChE activity and D2 density were negatively correlated with single PFCAs in several brain regions, whereas GS activity was positively correlated with PFASs primarily in occipital lobe. Results from the present study support the hypothesis that PFAS concentrations in polar bears from East Greenland have exceeded the threshold limits for neurochemical alterations. It is not known whether the observed alterations in neurochemical signaling are currently having negative effects on neurochemistry in East Greenland polar bears. However given the importance of these systems in cognitive processes and motor function, the present results indicate an urgent need for a better understanding of neurochemical effects of PFAS exposure to wildlife.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.015

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In polar bear brains, the highest PFAS concentrations were reported in the hypothalamus, brain stem, thalamus, and cerebellum, whereas the lowest concentrations were observed in the cortex.

    “The highest concentrations of PFAS were reported in the hypothalamus, brain stem, thalamus, and cerebellum, whereas the lowest concentrations were observed in the cortex (Greaves et al., 2013; Eggers Pedersen et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eggers Pedersen, K., Basu, N., Letcher, R., Greaves, A. K., Sonne, C., Dietz, R., & Styrishave, B.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
138
Pages
22-31
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155487495
Cited by
116
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFOS, perfluorocarboxylic acids, polar bear, neurochemical markers, monoamine oxidase, acetylcholinesterase, glutamine synthetase, dopamine D2 receptor, muscarinic receptors, neurotoxicity, Arctic contaminants, perfluoroundecanoic acid, top predators, East Greenland
MeSH terms
Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Ursidae, Brain, Carboxylic Acids, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase, Greenland, Male, Monoamine Oxidase, Mass Spectrometry, Biomarkers, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Receptors, Neurotransmitter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review