Cited by 944Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hunter-gatherers and human evolution.

Marlowe, Frank W.·2005·Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews

Abstract

Although few hunter-gatherers or foragers exist today, they are well documented in the ethnographic record. Anthropologists have been eager to study them since they assumed foragers represented a lifestyle that existed everywhere before 10,000 years ago and characterized our ancestors into some ill-defined but remote past. In the past few decades, that assumption has been challenged on several grounds. Ethnographically described foragers may be a biased sample that only continued to exist because they occupied marginal habitats less coveted by agricultural people.3 In addition, many foragers have been greatly influenced by their association with more powerful agricultural societies.4 It has even been suggested that Holocene foragers represent a new niche that appeared only with the climatic changes and faunal depletion at the end of the last major glaciation.5 Despite these issues, the ethnographic record of foragers provides the only direct observations of human behavior in the absence of agriculture, and as such is invaluable for testing hypotheses about human behavioral evolution.6.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/evan.20046

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 100 references

1 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Binford, 2001, Constructing frames of reference
  2. Foley, 1988, Hunters and gatherers: history, evolution and social change, 207
  3. Oswalt, 1973, Habitat and technology
  4. Kelly, 1995, The foraging spectrum
  5. Shimkin, 1983, Great Basin, 11, 517
  6. Lee, 1968, Man the hunter, 30
  7. Birdsell, 1968, Man the hunter, 229
  8. Tindale, 1953, Human biology: a record of research, 169
  9. Hiatt, 1996, Arguments about Aborigines
  10. Pusey, 1987, Primate societies, 250
  11. Murdock, 1949, Social structure
  12. Service, 1967, Primitive social organization
  13. van den Berghe, 1979, Human family systems
  14. 2000, Ethnologue
  15. Kingdon, 1997, African mammals
  16. Cheney, 1987, Primate societies, 267
  17. Nishida, 1987, Primate societies, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 929

Metadata

Authors
Marlowe, F. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Marlowe, Frank W.
Venue
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-13
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
54-67
ISSN
1060-1538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168363280
Cited by
944
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 46
FWCI
112.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
hunter-gatherers, human evolution, evolution of behavior, ethnographic records, sampling bias, agricultural societies, prehistoric human behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review