Cited by 71Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Antioxidant activity of six Portuguese thyme species essential oils

Open access
Dandlen, S. Anahi, Lima, A. Sofia, Mendes, Marta D., Miguel, M. Graça, Faleiro, M. Leonor, Sousa, M. João, Pedro, Luis G., Barroso, José G. +1 more·2010·Flavour and Fragrance Journal

Abstract

Abstract The essential oils of Thymus caespititius, T. camphoratus, T. capitellatus, T. carnosus, T. pulegioides, T. zygis subsp. zygis and T. zygis subsp. sylvestris collected in different regions of Portugal, including the Azores islands, were evaluated for preventing lipid peroxidation and scavenging free radicals, and hydroxyl and superoxide anions. T. zygis subsp. zygis oil possessed the best capacity for preventing lipid peroxidation (IC50 = 0.030 ± 0.003 mg/ml), immediately followed by the oils isolated from T. zygis subsp. sylvestris collected in different regions of Portugal. IC50 values ranged from 0.066 ± 0.003 to 0.087 ± 0.001 mg/ml in oils isolated from samples from Alcanena and Duas Igrejas, respectively. The oils isolated from T. zygis subsp. sylvestris, independent of the harvesting region, were shown to be the most effective for scavenging free radicals (0.358–0.453 mg/ml). The best capacity for scavenging hydroxyl radicals was found in the oils of T. camphoratus collected in Espartal and of T. caespititius of Lordelo, with IC50 < 0.5 mg/ml. The low oil amount did not allow IC50 values for the superoxide anion scavenging determination, therefore considering a unique oil concentration (5 mg/ml), the highest inhibition percentages (?50%) were registered with the essential oils of T. zygis subsp. sylvestris from Duas Igrejas and Covão do Coelho, and of T. capitellatus from Sines. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ffj.1972

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thymus zygis subsp. zygis and Thymus zygis subsp. sylvestris essential oils from different regions of Portugal showed good antioxidant activities in the TBARS assay, even better than BHT.

    “Thymus zygis subsp. zygis and Thymus zygis subsp. sylvestris oils obtained from different regions of Portugal showed good antioxidant activities, even better than that of BHT.”
  • Portuguese Thymus camphoratus, Thymus caespititius and Thymus capitellatus oils were significantly more effective in scavenging hydroxyl radicals than the remaining samples; oils with thymol or carvacrol predominating did not present significant activities, indicating phenolic compounds are not determinant for hydroxyl radical scavenging.

    “Among Portuguese Thymus species collected in different places of this country, Thymus camphoratus Hoffmanns. & Link, Thymus caespititius Brot., and Thymus capitellatus Hoffmanns. & Link oils from different origins were significantly more effective in scavenging hydroxyl radicals than the remaining samples.”
  • Of 28 Portuguese Thymus oils, only Thymus zygis ssp. sylvestris and Thymus capitellatus had superoxide anion scavenging activity >50%; results indicate phenolic compounds are not the only ones able to scavenge superoxide anion.

    “From the 28 essential oils evaluated, only Thymus zygis ssp. sylvestris and Thymus capitellatus collected in diferent places of Portugal had superoxide anion scavenging activity >50%.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. J. K. Donnelly, D. S. Robinson. Free Radic. Res. 1995, 22, 147.
  2. N. V. Yanishlieva, E. Marinova, J. Pokorný. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2006, 108, 776.
  3. N. Erdemoglu, N. N. Turan, I. Cakici, B. Sener, A. Aydin. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 9.
  4. A. R. Hraš, M. Hadolin, Ž. Knez, D. Bauman. Food Chem. 2000, 71, 229.
  5. C. Sánchez-Moreno. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2002, 8, 121.
  6. M. Antolovich, P. D. Prenzler, E. Patsalides, S. McDonald, K. Robards. Analyst 2002, 127, 183.
  7. D. Huang, O. Boxin, R. L. Prior. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841.
  8. L. K. MacDonald-Wicks, L. G. Wood, M. L. Garg. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 2046.
  9. M. Puertas-Mejía, S. Hillebrand, E. Stashenko, P. Winterhalter. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 380.
  10. A. C. Figueiredo, J. G. Barroso, L. G. Pedro, L. Salgueiro, M. G. Miguel, M. L. Faleiro. Curr. Pharm. Design 2008, 14, 3120.
  11. H. J. D. Dorman, S. G. Deans, R. C. Noble. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1995, 7, 645.
  12. W. Brand-Williams, M. E. Cuvelier, C. Berset. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 1995, 28, 25.
  13. S. K. Chung, T. Osawa, S. Kawakishi. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 118.
  14. M. Payá, B. Halliwell, J. R. S. Hoult. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992, 44, 205.
  15. A. Sokmen, M. Gulluce, H. A. Akpulat, D. Daferera, B. Tepe, M. Polissiou, M. Sokmen, F. Sahin. Food Control 2004, 15, 627.
  16. B. Tepe, M. Sokmen, H. A. Akpulat, D. Daferera, M. Polissiou, A. Sokmen. J. Food Eng. 2005, 66, 447.
  17. S. Bounatirou, S. Smiti, M. G. Miguel, L. Faleiro, M. N. Rejeb, M. Neff ati, M. M. Costa, A. C. Figueiredo, J. G. Barroso, L. G. Pedro. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 146.
  18. J. Safaei-Ghomi, A. H. Ebrahimabadi, Z. Djafari-Bidgoli, H. Batooli. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1524.
  19. S. Bourgou, R. Ksouri, I. Skandrani, L. Chekir-Ghedira, B. Marzouk. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2008, 20, 191.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dandlen, S. A., Lima, A. S., Mendes, M. D., Miguel, M. G., Faleiro, M. L., Sousa, M. J., Pedro, L. G., Barroso, J. G., & Figueiredo, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Algarve (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
Corresponding author
Miguel, M. Graça
Venue
Flavour and Fragrance Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-18
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
150-155
ISSN
  • 0882-5734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1026
OpenAlex
W2040459664
Cited by
71
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Flavour and Fragrance Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
thyme essential oil, thymus, antioxidant activity, lipid peroxidation inhibition, free radical scavenging, hydroxyl radical scavenging, superoxide radical scavenging, Thymus carnosus, Thymus pulegioides, regional variation, Azores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review