The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive overview of the quality of plant‐ And animal‐sourced proteins based on the digestible indispensable amino acid score
Open accessAbstract
Indispensable amino acid (IAA) composition and standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of five animal‐ and 12 plant‐based proteins were used to calculate their respective Digestible Indispensable Amino Score (DIAAS) according to the three age categories defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Mean IAA content and mean SID obtained from each protein dataset were subsequently used to simulate optimal nutritional quality of protein mixtures. Datasets revealed considerable variation in DIAAS within the same protein source and among different protein sources. Among the selected protein sources, and based on the 0.5‐ to 3‐year‐old reference pattern, pork meat, casein, egg, and potato proteins are classified as excellent quality proteins with an average DIAAS above 100. Whey and soy proteins are classified as high‐quality protein with an average DIAAS ≥75. Gelatin, rapeseed, lupin, canola, corn, hemp, fava bean, oat, pea, and rice proteins are classified in the no quality claim category (DIAAS <75). Potato, soy, and pea proteins can complement a broad range of plant proteins, leading to higher DIAAS when supplied in the form of protein mixtures and at specific ratios. Such complementarity highlights the potential to achieve an optimal nutritional efficiency with plant proteins alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stein, H. H., Sève, B., Fuller, M. F., Moughan, P. J., & de Lange, C. F. M. (2007) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2005-742 · Cited by 796
The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption
Boland, M. J., Rae, A. N., Vereijken, J. M., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Fischer, A. R. H., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., Rutherfurd, S. M., Gruppen, H., Moughan, P. J., & Hendriks, W. H. (2013) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2012.07.002 · Cited by 524
Mathai, J. K., Liu, Y., & Stein, H. H. (2017) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114517000125 · Cited by 432
Gorissen, S. H., Horstman, A. M., Franssen, R., Crombag, J. J., Langer, H., Bierau, J., Respondek, F., & van Loon, L. J. (2016) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.116.231340 · Cited by 221
Sarwar, G. (1997) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.758 · Cited by 205
Stein, H. H., Pedersen, C., Wirt, A. R., & Bohlke, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2005.83102387x · Cited by 152
Cited by
Current Concepts and Unresolved Questions in Dietary Protein Requirements and Supplements in Adults
Phillips, S. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2017.00013 · Cited by 145
Nichele, S., Phillips, S. M., & Boaventura, B. C. B. (2022) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2021-0806 · Cited by 61
Alternative dietary protein sources to support healthy and active skeletal muscle aging
van der Heijden, I., Monteyne, A. J., Stephens, F. B., & Wall, B. T. (2023) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuac049 · Cited by 45
Lee, Y. E. J., Goh, H. M., & Huang, D. (2025) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110664 · Cited by 32
Van de Velde, F., Cian, R. E., Garzón, A. G., Albarracín, M., & Drago, S. R. (2025) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation12010018 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Herreman, L., Nommensen, P., Pennings, B., & Laus, M. C.
- Venue
- Food Science & Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-08-25
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5379-5391
- ISSN
- 2048-7177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3080292653
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.