The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sodium reduction strategies through use of meat extenders (white button mushrooms vs. textured soy) in beef patties
Open accessAbstract
Lowering the sodium content in meat products, particularly in beef patties, can be challenging because sodium plays many functional roles in these products. Meat extenders can contribute to lower sodium content by imparting complementary flavors while reducing caloric and sodium content. A systematic comparison of two meat extenders, namely mushrooms and textured soy (TSP) in terms of physical and sensory characteristics, is presented herein. The physical properties of the samples suggested that the use of mushroom and TSP extender would perform statistically similar to an all‐meat control depending on the level of substitution. Hedonic sensory analysis showed meat extension using mushrooms yielded liking scores more similar to the all‐meat formulations than TSP in reduced sodium applications. The results of this research suggest that mushrooms have the potential to be successfully incorporated into reduced sodium meat products to provide a healthier product.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“These findings reveal that maintaining a high sodium level in meat analogs is important for consumer acceptance in terms of flavor, although this may lower the nutritional quality of the final product.”
From Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Liking scores for flavor were slightly lower in both the 20% TSP patty and the all-beef patty with reduced sodium compared to the all-beef control with regular sodium level.”
From Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This suggests that substitution of beef with plant protein up to 30% can lead to acceptable liking scores as long as the sodium content remains unchanged.”
From Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A first hedonic test with 55 consumers showed no significant difference in overall liking scores for all formulations compared to the all-beef control.”
From Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International
Horwitz, W., & LATIMER, G. W. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,948
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197610145.001.0001 · Cited by 5,942
Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences.
Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957) · Food technology · Cited by 1,344
Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Mosher, A. L., Piercy, K. L., Webber, B. J., Goodwin, S. K., Casavale, K. O., & Olson, R. D. (2014) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/1559827614521755 · Cited by 868
Reducing salt: A challenge for the meat industry
Desmond, E. (2006) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.014 · Cited by 815
Reducing sodium intake from meat products
Ruusunen, M., & Puolanne, E. (2005) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.016 · Cited by 606
El-Magoli, S. B., Laroia, S., & HANSEN, P. M. T. (1996) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/0309-1740(95)00032-1 · Cited by 259
Reducing the fat content in ground beef without sacrificing quality: A review
Brewer, M. S. (2012) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.024 · Cited by 194
Trout, G. R., & Schmidt, G. R. (1984) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13189.x · Cited by 162
Ruusunen, M., Vainionpää, J., Lyly, M., Lähteenmäki, L., Niemistö, M., Ahvenainen, R. T., & Puolanne, E. (2004) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.005 · Cited by 146
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Angus F., 2005, Salt in processed foods: collaborative research project, Leatherhead Food International
- Barbosa C.C., 2015, Sensory profile of beef beef with reduced sodium content, Acta Scientarium, 37, 301
- Bobe I.U., 2011, Proceedings of the 11th International congress on engineering and food, 687e688
- Campbell JF. (1979).Binding properties of meat blends effects of salt type blending time and post‐blending storage. Ph.D. Thesis Michigan State University.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016, Leading causes of death
- Lutz G.D.(2005).Personal communication: Alberger salt improves protein functionality in meat blends: Technical Bulletin.
- Madril M. T., 1985, Antimicrobial and functional effects of six polyphosphates in reduced NaCl comminuted meat products, Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie, 18, 316
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2007, Keep food safe: Food safety basics, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A. J., & Nolden, A. A. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9091334 · Cited by 398
“[31] SPC, WG Beef-like mince 55 New Zealand Chiang et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationGiacalone, D., Clausen, M. P., & Jaeger, S. R. (2022) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100919 · Cited by 260
Das, A. K., Nanda, P. K., Dandapat, P., Bandyopadhyay, S., Gullón, P., Sivaraman, G. K., McClements, D. J., Gullón, B., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26092463 · Cited by 212
Edible mushrooms as a novel trend in the development of healthier meat products
Pérez-Montes, A., Rangel‐Vargas, E., Lorenzo, J. M., Romero, L., & Santos, E. M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.004 · Cited by 149
Current trends, limitations and future research in the fungi?
Hyde, K. D., Baldrián, P., Chen, Y., Chethana, K. W. T., de Hoog, S., Doilom, M., de Farias, A. R. G., Gonçalves, M. F. M., Gonkhom, D., Gui, H., et al. (2024) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-023-00532-5 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, K. M., Corradini, M. G., Autio, W., & Kinchla, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kinchla, Amanda J.
- Venue
- Food Science & Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 506-518
- ISSN
- 2048-7177 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6392865
- OpenAlex
- W2914747199
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Food Science & Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- University of Massachusetts (MAS00493)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
- Keywords
- sodium reduction, meat extender, Agaricus bisporus, textured soy protein, beef patties, meat product formulation, sensory evaluation, physical properties, low-sodium meat products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
