The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP‐PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones
Open accessAbstract
We have designed DOP‐PCR primers specifically for the amplification of large insert clones for use in the construction of DNA microarrays. A bioinformatic approach was used to construct primers that were efficient in the general amplification of human DNA but were poor at amplifying E. coli DNA, a common contaminant of DNA preparations from large insert clones. We chose the three most selective primers for use in printing DNA microarrays. DNA combined from the amplification of large insert clones by use of these three primers and spotted onto glass slides showed more than a sixfold increase in the human to E. coli hybridization ratio when compared to the standard DOP‐PCR primer, 6MW. The microarrays reproducibly delineated previously characterized gains and deletions in a cancer cell line and identified a small gain not detected by use of conventional CGH. We also describe a method for the bulk testing of the hybridization characteristics of chromosome‐specific clones spotted on microarrays by use of DNA amplified from flow‐sorted chromosomes. Finally, we describe a set of clones selected from the publicly available Golden Path of the human genome at 1‐Mb intervals and a view in the Ensembl genome browser from which data required for the use of these clones in array CGH and other experiments can be downloaded across the Internet. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas
Hodgson, G., Hager, J. H., Volik, S., Hariono, S., Wernick, M., Moore, D., Albertson, D. G., Pinkel, D., Collins, C., Hanahan, D., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng771 · Cited by 294
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Carter NP, 1994, Bivariate chromosome analysis using a commercial flow cytometer, Methods Mol Biol, 29, 187
- Foreman PK, 2000, Real‐time PCR‐based method for assaying the purity of bacterial artificial chromosome preparations, Biotechniques, 29, 410, 10.2144/00293bm01 · doi:10.2144/00293bm01
- Humphray SJ, 2001, Contiguation of bacterial clones, Methods Mol Biol, 175, 69
- 10.1126/science.1359641 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35057062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60634-4 · doi:10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60634-4
- 10.1016/S0037-1963(00)90015-5 · doi:10.1016/s0037-1963(00)90015-5
- 10.1101/gr.7.11.1072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/2524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng0495-369 · DOI
- Ross MT, 1997, Genome mapping: a practical approach
- Roylance R, 1999, Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer, Cancer Res, 59, 1433
- 10.1038/ng754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199712)20:4<399::AID-GCC12>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90147-K · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/gcc.2870040311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/340426 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence
Fagagna, F. D. D., Reaper, P. M., Clay-Farrace, L., Fiegler, H., Carr, P., von Zglinicki, T., Saretzki, G., Carter, N. P., & Jackson, S. P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02118 · Cited by 2,917
Self-citationPollard, P. J., Brière, J. J., Alam, N. A., Barwell, J., Barclay, E., Wortham, N. C., Hunt, T., Mitchell, M., Olpin, S., Moat, S. J., et al. (2005) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi227 · Cited by 865
Self-citationA tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome
Ishkanian, A. S., Malloff, C. A., Watson, S. K., deLeeuw, R. J., Chi, B., Coe, B. P., Snijders, A., Albertson, D. G., Pinkel, D., Marra, M. A., et al. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1307 · Cited by 624
Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer
Pinkel, D., & Albertson, D. G. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1569 · Cited by 585
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiegler, H., Carr, P., Douglas, E. J., Burford, D. C., Hunt, S., Smith, J., Vetrie, D., Gorman, P., Tomlinson, I. P. M., & Carter, N. P.
- Venue
- Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-30
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 361-374
- ISSN
- 1045-2257 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2264
- OpenAlex
- W1970980262
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP‐PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gcc.10155
- The paper
- Fiegler, H., Carr, P., Douglas, E. J., Burford, D. C., Hunt, S., Smith, J., Vetrie, D., Gorman, P., Tomlinson, I. P. M., & Carter, N. P. (2003). DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP‐PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.10155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.