Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Las Cargas: Characterization and Prehistoric Use of a Southern Andean Obsidian Source

Salgán, Laura, Garvey, Raven, Neme, Gustavo, Gil, Adolfo, Giesso, Martín, Glascock, Michael D., Durán, Víctor·2015·Geoarchaeology

Abstract

The importance of obsidian from the northern Patagonian source at Las Cargas is reflected in its early use (∼8000 years B.P.) and extensive geographic diffusion but is nonetheless surprising in light of the source's high altitude (located in the Andes Cordillera), which makes it both difficult to access under ideal conditions and inaccessible for much of the year. Prehistoric use of the Las Cargas source can inform us about mobility, subsistence choices, economics of stone consumption, trade, and territoriality. Here we present the results of various lines of evidence (surface survey, X‐ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron activation analyses, artifact morphometry, and obsidian hydration dating) used to characterize obsidian from Las Cargas and its prehistoric use during the Holocene. Results indicate that Las Cargas obsidian occurs at the source as blocks and nodules, which are chemically homogeneous and of variable quality. Use of the source was nearly continuous through time, and the primary knapping activities performed there were the production of blanks and preparation of cores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gea.21502

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sources Las Cargas, Laguna del Maule (1 and 2), Cerro Huenul and Arroyo Paramillos have been exploited since ca. 9000 years BP.

    “Las fuentes Las Cargas, Laguna del Maule (1 y 2), Cerro Huenul y Arroyo Paramillos, han sido explotadas desde ca.9000 años AP (Salgán et al., 2015;Barberena et al., 2018;Cortegoso et al., 2020;Sanhueza et al., 2021).”
  • Sources located in cordilleran environments (>2,500 m a.s.l.) are available only during the summer season due to snow cover formed in winter, while those located outside the cordilleran area (<2,500 m a.s.l.) are easily accessible and have annual availability.

    “Las fuentes ubicadas en ambientes cordilleranos (> 2.500 m s.n.m.) están disponibles solo durante la temporada estival debido a la cubierta de nieve que se forma en el invierno.Mientras que aquellas ubicadas por fuera del área cordillerana (< 2.500 m s.n.m.) son de fácil acceso y poseen una disponibilidad anual (Cortegoso et al., 2012(Cortegoso et al., , 2020;;Salgán et al., 2015;Salgán y Pompei,”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Aschero C.A., 2004, Temas de Arqueología, Análisis Lítico, 7
  2. 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beck C., 2011, Perspectives on prehistoric trade and exchange in California and Great Basin, 55
  4. Binford L.R., 1984, An Alyawara day: The stone quarry, Journal of Anthropological Research, 40, 406, 10.1086/jar.40.3.3629763 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/gea.21470 · DOI
  6. Cortegoso V., 2012, Paleoecología humana en el sur de Mendoza, 180
  7. Francesco A.M., 2006, Arqueología y Ambiente de Áreas Naturales Protegidas de la Provincia de Mendoza, 53
  8. Durán V., 2004, Estudios de redes de aprovisionamiento y redes de distribución de obsidiana durante el Holoceno Tardío en el sur de Mendoza (Argentina), Estudios Atacameños, 28, 25
  9. Durán V., 2012, Caracterización y procedencia de obsidianas de sitios arqueológicos del Centro Oeste de Argentina y Centro de Chile con metodología no destructiva por Fluorescencia de Rayos X (XRF), Intersecciones en Antropología, 13, 423
  10. 10.1016/j.jas.2008.02.009 · DOI
  11. Garvey R.(2012).Human behavioral responses to Middle Holocene climate changes in northern Argentine Patagonia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of California Davis.
  12. 10.1017/CBO9781139207775.013 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00555.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Glascock M.D., 2012, Report on the analysis of obsidian source samples by multiple analytical methods, Report on file at the Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Missouri‐Columbia
  15. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9276-8_2 · DOI
  16. Halstead P., 1984, Bad years economics. New directions in archaeology, 1
  17. 10.1006/jasc.2001.0705 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/jasc.1994.1026 · DOI
  19. Ingbar E., 1994, The organization of North American prehistoric chipped stone technologies, 45
  20. King J., 2011, Perspectives on prehistoric trade and exchange in California and Great Basin, 148
  21. Moratto M., 2011, Perspectives on prehistoric trade and exchange in California and Great Basin, 242
  22. 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.06.059 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.032 · DOI
  24. Neme G.(2007).Cazadores‐Recolectores de Altura en los Andes Meridionales: El Alto Valle del Río Atuel. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 1591. · DOI
  25. Neme G., 2008, Biogeografía humana en los Andes meridionales: Tendencias arqueológicas en el sur de Mendoza, Chúngara, Revista de Antropología Chilena, 40, 5
  26. 10.1086/596199 · DOI
  27. Neme G., 2012, Paleoecología humana en el sur de Mendoza, 255
  28. 10.1016/j.jas.2006.07.005 · DOI
  29. Rogers A., 2009, An estimate of coso obsidian hydration rate, based on obsidian‐radiocarbon pairings and the “weighted total least squares” method, International Association for Obsidian Studies Bulletin, 41, 9
  30. Rogers A., 2011, An improved equation for coso obsidian hydration dating, based on obsidian–radiocarbon association, Society of California Archaeology Proceedings, 25, 1
  31. Salgán M.L.(2012).Organización tecnológica y biogeografía humana en La Payunia sur de la Provincia de Mendoza. Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation Universidad Nacional de La Plata La Plata.
  32. 10.4067/S0718-22442012000100015 · DOI
  33. Salgán M.L, 2014, Movilidad, aprovisionamiento y uso de obsidiana en El Payén, sur de la provincia de Mendoza, Argentina, Comechingonia, 18, 33
  34. 10.2307/3537011 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9276-8 · DOI
  36. Shackley M.S., 2005, Obsidian: Geology and archaeology in the North American Southwest
  37. 10.1002/gea.21475 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.11.016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salgán, L., Garvey, R., Neme, G., Gil, A., Giesso, M., Glascock, M. D., & Durán, V.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Antropología Museo de Historia Natural de San Rafael‐CONICET/IANIGLIA Mendoza Argentina
  • Department of Anthropology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
  • Departamento de Antropología Museo de Historia Natural de San Rafael‐CONICET/IANIGLIA and Universidad Nacional de Cuyo Mendoza Argentina
  • Department of Anthropology Northeastern Illinois University Chicago Illinois
  • Research Reactor Center University of Missouri Columbia Missouri
  • Laboratorio de Paleoecología Humana Universidad Nacional de Cuyo‐CONICET Mendoza Argentina
Venue
Geoarchaeology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
139-150
ISSN
  • 0883-6353
  • 1520-6548
Cited by
22
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (2012-1015)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review