Cited by 30Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesWater management and technologiesSoil and Environmental Studies

Early evidence of irrigation technology in the North China Plain: Geoarchaeological investigations at the Anshang Site, Neihuang County, Henan Province, China

Storozum, Michael, Liu, Haiwang, Qin, Zhen, Ming, Kongde, Fu, Kui, Wang, Hui, Kidder, Tristram·2018·Geoarchaeology

Abstract

The development of irrigation is a politically important technology that enabled agricultural societies to intensify agricultural production. In the North China Plain, the historical record suggests a long tradition of irrigation, but archaeologists have found scant evidence of these technologies outside of urban areas. In 2012, 2015, and 2016, our excavations at the Anshang site, Neihuang County, Henan Province, China, revealed several archaeological features that we interpret as evidence of Late Shang dynasty (ca. 1200–1046 B.C.) canal construction in a nonurban context. By using a range of geological methods, including particle size, loss on ignition, magnetic susceptibility, and micromorphology, we suggest that these ancient canals and the subsequent construction phases found at Anshang not only influenced the development of local geomorphic conditions, but also were part of early dynastic attempts to restructure the natural landscape to facilitate agricultural productivity. These irrigation canals found at Anshang may be representative of broader trends of human‐environmental interactions in the North China Plain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gea.21634

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early and indigenous ditch-based irrigation systems have been examined across Asia, North, Central, and South America.

    “Early and indigenous ditch-based irrigation systems have also been examined across Asia 37,38 and North 29,39,40 , Central 41 and South America 42 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storozum, M., Liu, H., Qin, Z., Ming, K., Fu, K., Wang, H., & Kidder, T.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology (CN)
  • Archaeological Research Unit Anyang P.R. China
  • Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Storozum, Michael
Venue
Geoarchaeology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
143-161
ISSN
  • 0883-6353 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6548
OpenAlex
W2735751856
Cited by
30
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoarchaeology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Explorers Club
  • National Geographic Society (970415)
  • Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (1458136)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Water management and technologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
irrigation canals, Late Shang dynasty, North China Plain, human-nature relationship, canal construction, geomorphological change, agricultural intensification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review