Cited by 93Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Estimating genome-wide significance for whole-genome sequencing studies

Open access
Xu, ChangJiang, Tachmazidou, Ioanna, Walter, Klaudia, Ciampi, Antonio, Zeggini, Eleftheria, Greenwood, Celia M. T., the UK10K Consortium·2014·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Although a standard genome-wide significance level has been accepted for the testing of association between common genetic variants and disease, the era of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) requires a new threshold. The allele frequency spectrum of sequence-identified variants is very different from common variants, and the identified rare genetic variation is usually jointly analyzed in a series of genomic windows or regions. In nearby or overlapping windows, these test statistics will be correlated, and the degree of correlation is likely to depend on the choice of window size, overlap, and the test statistic. Furthermore, multiple analyses may be performed using different windows or test statistics. Here we propose an empirical approach for estimating genome-wide significance thresholds for data arising from WGS studies, and we demonstrate that the empirical threshold can be efficiently estimated by extrapolating from calculations performed on a small genomic region. Because analysis of WGS may need to be repeated with different choices of test statistics or windows, this prediction approach makes it computationally feasible to estimate genome-wide significance thresholds for different analysis choices. Based on UK10K whole-genome sequence data, we derive genome-wide significance thresholds ranging between 2.5 × 10(-8) and 8 × 10(-8) for our analytic choices in window-based testing, and thresholds of 0.6 × 10(-8) -1.5 × 10(-8) for a combined analytic strategy of testing common variants using single-SNP tests together with rare variants analyzed with our sliding-window test strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.21797

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, C., Tachmazidou, I., Walter, K., Ciampi, A., Zeggini, E., Greenwood, C. M. T., & the UK10K Consortium
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Greenwood, Celia M. T.
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-14
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
281-290
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W1554193366
Cited by
93
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-115110)
  • Wellcome Trust (098051, WT091310)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
whole genome sequencing, rare variants, allele frequency spectrum, common genetic variants, multiple testing correction
MeSH terms
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review