Cited by 849Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms

Open access
Gao, Xiaoyi, Starmer, Joshua, Martin, Eden R.·2008·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Multiple testing is a challenging issue in genetic association studies using large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, many of which exhibit linkage disequilibrium (LD). Failure to adjust for multiple testing appropriately may produce excessive false positives or overlook true positive signals. The Bonferroni method of adjusting for multiple comparisons is easy to compute, but is well known to be conservative in the presence of LD. On the other hand, permutation‐based corrections can correctly account for LD among SNPs, but are computationally intensive. In this work, we propose a new multiple testing correction method for association studies using SNP markers. We show that it is simple, fast and more accurate than the recently developed methods and is comparable to permutation‐based corrections using both simulated and real data. We also demonstrate how it might be used in whole‐genome association studies to control type I error. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method make it an attractive choice for multiple testing adjustment when there is high intermarker LD in the SNP data set. Genet. Epidemiol . 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.20310

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To provide more conservative results accounting for the number of tested proteins, the study used a strategy described by Gao et al. and Kettunen et al. that accommodates the correlation between protein levels.

    “To also provide the more conservative results accounting for the number of tested proteins, we used a strategy described by Gao et al.35 and Kettunen et al.36, which accommodates the correlation between protein levels.”

    From Genetic determinants of plasma protein levels in the Estonian population (2024) · cites this paper as Gao et al. [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bonferroni CE. 1935. Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su gruppi di teste, chapter ''Studi in Onore del Professore Salvatore ortu Carboni''. Rome. p 13-60.
  2. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Berlin: Springer.
  3. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. London: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, X., Starmer, J., & Martin, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Gao, Xiaoyi
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
361-369
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2105673666
Cited by
849
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 32
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ag019757-06)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG20135, R01AG020135, AG019757)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS3 9764, P50NS039764)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES007126, ES 007126)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
multiple testing correction, genetic association studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms, linkage disequilibrium, Bonferroni correction, type I error control, whole-genome association studies, false positives
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Biometry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Epidemiologic Methods, Genetic Techniques, Humans, Models, Genetic, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Principal Component Analysis, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review