Cited by 40Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Differential effects of Th1 and Th2 lymphocyte supernatants on human microglia

Séguin, Rosanne, Biernacki, Katarzyna, Prat, Alexandre, Wosik, Karolina, Kim, Ho‐Jin, Blain, Manon, Mccrea, Ellie, Bar‐Or, Amit +1 more·2003·Glia

Abstract

We assessed the effects of soluble molecules (supernatants) produced by pro- (Th1) and anti- (Th2) inflammatory T-cell lines on the capacity of adult human CNS-derived microglia to express or produce selected cell surface and soluble molecules that regulate immune reactivity or impact on tissue protection/repair within the CNS. Treatment of microglia with supernatants from allo-antigen and myelin basic protein-specific Th1 cell lines augmented expression of cell surface molecules MHC class II, CD80, CD86, CD40, and CD54, enhanced the functional antigen-presenting cell capacity of microglia in a mixed lymphocyte reaction, and increased cytokine/chemokine secretion (TNFalpha, IL-6, and CXCL10/IP-10). These Th1-induced effects were not reproduced by interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) alone and were only incompletely blocked by anti-IFNgamma antibody. Th2 cell supernatant treatments did not alter costimulatory/adhesion molecule expression or induce cytokine/chemokine production by microglia. Th2 treatment, furthermore, failed to reduce the induction observed in response to Th1 supernatants. Neither Th1 nor Th2 supernatants induced production of the neurotrophin molecules, nerve growth factor, or brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Our results suggest that soluble molecules released by Th1 and not Th2 cells that infiltrate the CNS can stimulate resident microglia to acquire enhanced effector and accessory cell functions; the Th1-induced effects were not downregulated by Th2 supernatant-me…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.10201

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Séguin, R., Biernacki, K., Prat, A., Wosik, K., Kim, H., Blain, M., Mccrea, E., Bar‐Or, A., & Antel, J. P.
Affiliations
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Antel, Jack P.
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-12
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
36-45
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W2075766733
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
Th1 cells, Th2 cells, microglia, T cell supernatants, antigen presentation, costimulatory molecules, MHC class II, CD80, CD86, CD40, ICAM-1, TNF-α, interleukin-6, CXCL10, interferon-gamma, neurotrophins, nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, bystander suppression, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Cell-Free System, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Cytokines, Culture Media, Conditioned, Microglia, Th1 Cells, Th2 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review