The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stab wound injury of the zebrafish telencephalon: A model for comparative analysis of reactive gliosis
Abstract
Reactive glia, including astroglia and oligodendrocyte progenitors (OPCs) are at the core of the reaction to injury in the mammalian brain with initially beneficial and later partially adverse functions such as scar formation. Given the different glial composition in the adult zebrafish brain with radial ependymoglia but no parenchymal astrocytes, we examined the glial response to an invasive stab wound injury model in the adult zebrafish telencephalon. Strikingly, already a few days after injury the wound was closed without any scar tissue. Similar to mammals, microglia cells reacted first and accumulated close to the injury site, while neither GFAP+ radial ependymoglia nor adult OPCs were recruited to the injury site. Moreover, OPCs failed to increase their proliferation after this injury, while the number of proliferating GFAP+ glia was increased until 7 days after injury. Importantly, neurogenesis was also increased after injury, generating additional neurons recruited to the parenchyma which survived for several months. Thus, these data suggest that the specific glial environment in the adult zebrafish telencephalon is not only permissive for long‐term neuronal survival, but avoids scar formation. Invasive injury in the adult zebrafish telencephalon may therefore provide a useful model to untangle the molecular mechanisms involved in these beneficial glial reactions. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microglia: Active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain
Hanisch, U.-K., & Kettenmann, H. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1997 · Cited by 3,676
Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke
Arvidsson, A., Collin, T., Kirik, D., Kokaia, Z., & Lindvall, O. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm747 · Cited by 2,799
Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation
Sofroniew, M. V. (2009) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.08.002 · Cited by 2,594
The bHLH Transcription Factors OLIG2 and OLIG1 Couple Neuronal and Glial Subtype Specification
Zhou, Q., & Anderson, D. J. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00677-3 · Cited by 1,059
PDGFRA/NG2 glia generate myelinating oligodendrocytes and piriform projection neurons in adult mice
Rivers, L. E., Young, K. M., Rizzi, M., Jamen, F., Psachoulia, K., Wade, A., Kessaris, N., & Richardson, W. D. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2220 · Cited by 961
Astrocyte glycogen and brain energy metabolism
Brown, A. M., & Ransom, B. R. (2007) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.20557 · Cited by 626
Grandel, H., Kaslin, J., Ganz, J., Wenzel, I., & Brand, M. (2006) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.040 · Cited by 598
Dimou, L., Simon, C., Kirchhoff, F., Takebayashi, H., & Götz, M. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2831-08.2008 · Cited by 551
Thored, P., Wood, J., Arvidsson, A., Cammenga, J., Kokaia, Z., & Lindvall, O. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.488445 · Cited by 421
Astrocyte intermediate filaments in CNS pathologies and regeneration
Pekny, M., & Pekna, M. (2004) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1645 · Cited by 420 · cited 5×
“Thus, minimizing the number of astroglia and Olig21 glia around the injury site or altering the signals mediated by these cells (as in the GFAP/Vimentin double knock-out mice (Pekny and Nilsson, 2005; Pekny and Pekna, 2004; Widestrand et al., 2007)) may help to pro-”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Reactive Astrocytes: Production, Function, and Therapeutic Potential
Liddelow, S. A., & Barres, B. A. (2017) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.006 · Cited by 2,336
Verkhratsky, A., & Nedergaard, M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2016 · Cited by 1,678
Astrocyte reactivity and reactive astrogliosis: costs and benefits
Pekny, M., & Pekna, M. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2013 · Cited by 934
Acute Inflammation Initiates the Regenerative Response in the Adult Zebrafish Brain
Kyritsis, N., Kizil, C., Zocher, S., Kroehne, V., Kaslin, J., Freudenreich, D., Iltzsche, A., & Brand, M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1228773 · Cited by 517
Neurogenesis in zebrafish – from embryo to adult
Schmidt, R., Strähle, U., & Scholpp, S. (2013) · Neural Development · doi:10.1186/1749-8104-8-3 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumgart, E. V., Barbosa, J. S., Bally‐cuif, L., Götz, M., & Ninkovic, J.
- Venue
- Glia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11-21
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 343-357
- ISSN
- 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1136
- OpenAlex
- W2169543334
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stab wound injury of the zebrafish telencephalon: A model for comparative analysis of reactive gliosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/glia.22269
- The paper
- Baumgart, E. V., Barbosa, J. S., Bally‐cuif, L., Götz, M., & Ninkovic, J. (2012). Stab wound injury of the zebrafish telencephalon: A model for comparative analysis of reactive gliosis. Glia. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.