The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The origin and nature of ramified and amoeboid microglia: A historical review and current concepts
Abstract
The origin of ramified microglia has been a longstanding controversial issue, with 4 major schools of thought, which state that they are derived (1) from invasion of mesodermal pial elements, (2) from neuroectodermal matrix cells together with the macroglia, (3) from pericytes, and (4) from invasion of monocytes in early development. This paper is in support of the last‐mentioned hypothesis. It is known that ramified microglial cells do not divide under normal circumstances, and since our studies in the corpus callosum have shown that these cells do not appear until the fifth postnatal day, it is reasoned that they must be derived from some preexisting mitotically active cells. The putative precursor is the preponderant amoeboid microglia in the same region. Our experimental studies with the carbon labelling technique have demonstrated for the first time that blood monocytes invade into the early postnatal brain to become amoeboid microglia, which then differentiate into ramified microglia. Just like other tissue macrophages, the monocyte‐derived amoeboid microglia exhibit features indicative of phagocytic activities. These include the content of hydrolytic enzymes, uptake of carbon, and a characteristic surface morphology, as seen by scanning electron microscopy. The transformation of amoeboid microglia into ramified microglia, which occurs between the second and third postnatal week, is considered to be a regressive phenomenon, as shown by the diminution of their content of hydrolytic enzymes and the downregulation of membrane antigen. Apart from their primary role as active phagocytes, their involvement in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is evidenced recently by the fact that the cells are specifically marked by antibodies present in the cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients. In conclusion, ramified microglial cells are derived from monocytes, but through an intermediate amoeboid microglia stage as active macrophages in the perinatal period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perry, V. H., Hume, D. A., & Gordon, S. (1985) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(85)90215-5 · Cited by 902
Cited by
Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease
Akiyama, H. (2000) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00124-x · Cited by 4,514
Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS
Kreutzberg, G. W. (1996) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7 · Cited by 4,396
The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression
Hambardzumyan, D., Gutmann, D. H., & Kettenmann, H. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4185 · Cited by 1,683
Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development
Zhang, W., Xiao, D., Mao, Q., & Xia, H. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01486-5 · Cited by 1,668
MCGEER, P., & MCGEER, E. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(95)00011-9 · Cited by 1,287
Metadata
- Authors
- Ling, E., & Wong, W.
- Venue
- Glia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-18
- ISSN
- 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1136
- OpenAlex
- W2114354962
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The origin and nature of ramified and amoeboid microglia: A historical review and current concepts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/glia.440070105
- The paper
- Ling, E., & Wong, W. (1993). The origin and nature of ramified and amoeboid microglia: A historical review and current concepts. Glia. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.440070105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.