Cited by 71Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Efficacy and safety of donepezil over 3 years: an open-label, multicentre study in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Burns, A., Gauthier, S., Perdomo, C.·2007·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This 132-week, open-label extension study assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil in 579 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) who had previously participated in a 24-week double-blind study of 5 or 10 mg/day donepezil vs placebo. METHOD: Patients enrolled in the present study had a 6-week single-blind placebo washout period followed by treatment with donepezil 5 mg/day for 6 weeks with an optional increase in dosage to 10 mg/day between weeks 6 and 32. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of open-label treatment with donepezil 5 mg/day, mean Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -- cognitive subscale scores (ADAS-cog) improved by approximately two points, while after 12 weeks of open-label treatment (with a majority of patients receiving 10 mg/day), the mean ADAS-cog score was 1 point better than the score at the end of the placebo washout period. Scores then declined gradually over the remainder of the study. Mean changes in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scores showed slight improvement over the first 12 weeks of open-label treatment and then slowly declined for the remainder of the study period. Donepezil was well tolerated over the entire 162-week study period. Overall, 85% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE). The most common included diarrhoea (12%), nausea (11%), infection (11%) and accidental injury (10%). Some patients discontinued the study due to AEs (15%). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the conclusion that donepezil is safe and effective for the long-term treatment of patients with mild to moderate AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.1746

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer term benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors, from 2 to 4 or more years, have been demonstrated in open-label extension and long-term prospective observational clinical cohort studies.

    “Longer term benefits, from 2 to 4 or more years have been demonstrated in open-label extension 69,[88][89][90] and long-term prospective observational clinical cohort studies.[91][92][93][94][95]”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [88]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burns, A., Gauthier, S., & Perdomo, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Eisai (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, A.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-02
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
806-812
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2018309238
Cited by
71
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eisai
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
donepezil, Alzheimer's disease, long-term efficacy, drug safety, cholinesterase inhibitors, open-label extension, ADAS-Cog, Clinical Dementia Rating, adverse events, dose escalation, mild to moderate dementia
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Indans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Piperidines, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review