Cited by 26Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Is there equity in initial access to formal dementia care in Europe? The Andersen Model applied to the Actifcare cohort

Open access
Kerpershoek, Liselot, de Vugt, Marjolein, Wolfs, Claire, Orrell, Martin, Woods, Bob, Jelley, Hannah, Meyer, Gabriele, Bieber, Anja +13 more·2020·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the current study, the Anderson model is used to determine equitable access to dementia care in Europe. Predisposing, enabling, and need variables were investigated to find out whether there is equitable access to dementia-specific formal care services. Results can identify which specific factors should be a target to improve access. METHODS: A total of 451 People with middle-stage dementia and their informal carers from eight European countries were included. At baseline, there was no use of formal care yet, but people were expected to start using formal care within the next year. Logistic regressions were carried out with one of four clusters of service use as dependent variables (home social care, home personal care, day care, admission). The independent variables (predisposing, enabling, and need variables) were added to the regression in blocks. RESULTS: The most significant predictors for the different care clusters are disease severity, a higher sum of (un)met needs, hours spent on informal care, living alone, age, region of residence, and gender. CONCLUSION: The Andersen model provided for this cohort the insight that (besides need factors) the predisposing variables region of residence, gender, and age do play a role in finding access to care. In addition, it showed us that the numbers of hours spent on informal care, living alone, needs, and disease severity are also important predictors within the model's framework. Health care professionals should pay attention to these predisposing factors to ensure that they do not become barriers for those in need for care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.5213

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Dementia W. A public health priority. 2012. ISBN. 2012; 978(92): 4.
  2. [33]OECD, Health at a Glance. OECD Indicators. 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017: 216.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerpershoek, L., de Vugt, M., Wolfs, C., Orrell, M., Woods, B., Jelley, H., Meyer, G., Bieber, A., Stephan, A., Selbæk, G., Michelet, M., Wimo, A., Handels, R., Irving, K., Hopper, L., Gonçalves‐Pereira, M., Balsinha, C., Zanetti, O., Portolani, D., Verhey, F., & the Actifcare Consortium
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Maastricht University Alzheimer Centrum Limburg NL The Netherlands
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli (IT)
  • IRCSS Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Brescia IT
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
45-52
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2982108208
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (733051001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
dementia care, health care access, health equity, Andersen Behavioral Model, informal caregivers, home care, daycare centers, institutionalization, unmet needs, disease severity, living alone, gender differences, regional disparities
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Europe, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review