Cited by 99Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDental Research and COVID-19Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic

Utility of telemedicine in sub‐Saharan Africa during the COVID ‐19 pandemic. A rapid review

Open access
Chitungo, Itai, Mhango, Malizgani, Mbunge, Elliot, Dzobo, Mathias, Musuka, Godfrey, Dzinamarira, Tafadzwa·2021·Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies

Abstract

Telemedicine is the use of technology to achieve remote care. This review looks at the utility of telemedicine during the pandemic, period March 2020 to February 2021. Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. There was moderate use of telemedicine in sub-Sahara Africa during the pandemic, however, there were also some limitations. Benefits of telemedicine include continuing medical service provision, connecting relatives with loved ones in quarantine, education, and awareness of mental health issues, and toxicovigilance and infection control. Challenges to the implementation of telemedicine on the continent were lack of supporting telemedicine framework and policies, digital barriers, and patient and healthcare personnel biases. To address these challenges, this article proposes the development of policy frameworks that fosters telemedicine use by all stakeholders, including medical insurance organizations, the introduction of telemedicine training of medical workers, educational awareness programs for the public, and improvement of digital platforms access and affordability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbe2.297

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chitungo, I., Mhango, M., Mbunge, E., Dzobo, M., Musuka, G., & Dzinamarira, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
  • University of Eswatini (SZ)
  • ICAP Global Health (US)
Corresponding author
Dzinamarira, Tafadzwa
Venue
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-02
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
843-853
ISSN
2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210395964
Cited by
98
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Keywords
telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, sub-Saharan Africa, remote care, digital divide, mental health awareness, toxicovigilance, infection control, telehealth education, health insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review