The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scale‐free dynamics of global functional connectivity in the human brain
Open accessAbstract
Higher brain functions depend upon the rapid creation and dissolution of ever changing synchronous cell assemblies. We examine the hypothesis that the dynamics of this process displays scale‐free, self‐similar properties. EEGs (19 channels, average reference, sample frequency 500 Hz) of 15 healthy subjects (10 men; mean age 22.5 years) were analyzed during eyes‐closed and eyes‐open no‐task conditions. Mean level of synchronization as a function of time was estimated with the synchronization likelihood for five frequency bands (0.5–4, 4–8, 8–13, 13–30, and 30–48 Hz). Scaling in these time series was investigated with detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). DFA analysis of global synchronization time series showed scale‐free characteristics, suggesting neuronal dynamics do not necessarily have a characteristic time constant. The scaling exponent as determined with DFA differed significantly for different frequency bands and conditions. The exponent was close to 1.5 for low frequencies (δ, θ, and α) and close to 1 for β and γ bands. Eye opening decreased the exponent, in particular in α and β bands. Fluctuations of EEG synchronization in δ, θ, α, β, and γ bands exhibit scale‐free dynamics in eyes‐closed as well as eyes‐open no‐task states. The decrease in the scaling exponent following eye opening reflects a relative preponderance of rapid fluctuations with respect to slow changes in the mean synchronization level. The existence of scaling suggests that the underlying dynamics may display self‐organized criticality, possibly representing a near‐optimal state for information processing. Hum. Brain Mapping 22:99–111, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detecting strange attractors in turbulence
Takens, F. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0091924 · Cited by 10,459 · cited 1×
“From each of these time series and for each time i, we construct vectors Xi and Yi in state space with the method of time-delay embedding [Takens, 1981].”
MethodFunctional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
Long-Range Temporal Correlations and Scaling Behavior in Human Brain Oscillations
Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Nikouline, V. V., Palva, J. M., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-04-01370.2001 · Cited by 1,149
Consciousness and the Binding Problem
SINGER, W. (2001) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05712.x · Cited by 367
Phase-coupling of theta–gamma EEG rhythms during short-term memory processing
Schack, B., Vath, N., Petsche, H., Geissler, H.-G., & Möller, E. (2002) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(01)00199-4 · Cited by 281
Freeman, W. J., Burke, B. C., & Holmes, M. D. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10120 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“Finally, several authors have suggested that the complex dynamics of synchronization and desynchronization processes in the brain might be due to so called “self-organized criticality” [Bak et al., 1987; Freeman et al., 2003; Le van Quyen, 2003].”
Background
Cited by
Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review
Friston, K. J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 · Cited by 3,415
Emergent complex neural dynamics
Chialvo, D. R. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1803 · Cited by 1,165
The Temporal Structures and Functional Significance of Scale-free Brain Activity
He, B. J., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.020 · Cited by 990
Can structure predict function in the human brain?
Honey, C. J., Thivierge, J.-P., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.071 · Cited by 629
Metadata
- Authors
- Stam, C. J., & de Bruin, E. A.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-109
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W1974458218
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale‐free dynamics of global functional connectivity in the human brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20016
- The paper
- Stam, C. J., & de Bruin, E. A. (2004). Scale‐free dynamics of global functional connectivity in the human brain. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.