Cited by 990Neural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis

The Temporal Structures and Functional Significance of Scale-free Brain Activity

Open access
He, Biyu J., Zempel, John M., Snyder, Abraham Z., Raichle, Marcus E.·2010·Neuron

Abstract

Scale-free dynamics, with a power spectrum following P proportional to f(-beta), are an intrinsic feature of many complex processes in nature. In neural systems, scale-free activity is often neglected in electrophysiological research. Here, we investigate scale-free dynamics in human brain and show that it contains extensive nested frequencies, with the phase of lower frequencies modulating the amplitude of higher frequencies in an upward progression across the frequency spectrum. The functional significance of scale-free brain activity is indicated by task performance modulation and regional variation, with beta being larger in default network and visual cortex and smaller in hippocampus and cerebellum. The precise patterns of nested frequencies in the brain differ from other scale-free dynamics in nature, such as earth seismic waves and stock market fluctuations, suggesting system-specific generative mechanisms. Our findings reveal robust temporal structures and behavioral significance of scale-free brain activity and should motivate future study on its physiological mechanisms and cognitive implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.020

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several lines of evidence point to fractal-like (1/f) self-similarity over different spatio-temporal scales in brain dynamics and structure.

    “Several lines of evidence point to fractal-like (1/f) self-similarity over different spatio-temporal scales in brain dynamics and structure [76,77].”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [76]

  • There is evidence for scale-invariance in neurophysiological processes.

    “there does appear to be evidence for some kind of scale-invariance in neurophysiological processes (Section 3.2 [76,77]).”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [76]

  • EEG and its underlying neural activity almost never consist of a single-frequency rhythm; they include a mixture of rhythms and an arrhythmic component with a 1/f power-law distribution over a broad band.

    “This is because EEG, or its underlying neural activity, nearly never manifests itself as a single-frequency rhythm; instead, it always contains a mixture of rhythms, and an arrhythmic component that follows a power-law (1/f) distribution across a broadband (168).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kornhuber HH Deecke L 1965 Changes in the Brain Potential in Voluntary Movements and Passive Movements in Man: Readiness Potential and Reafferent Potentials Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere 284 1 17 14341490

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, B. J., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
He, Biyu J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
353-369
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148791497
Cited by
990
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 48
FWCI
26.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (06833)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS006833)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Keywords
scale-free dynamics, brain activity, power spectrum, frequency modulation, temporal structure, default mode network, visual cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, task performance, regional variation, complex dynamics
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review