The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the neurobiological substrates of self-recognition yields important insight into socially and clinically critical cognitive functions such as theory of mind. Experimental evidence suggests that right frontal and parietal lobes preferentially process self-referent information. Recognition of one's own face is an important parameter of self-recognition, but well-controlled experimental data on the brain substrates of self-face recognition is limited. The goal of this study was to characterize the activation specific to self-face in comparison with control conditions of two levels of familiarity: unknown unfamiliar face and the more stringent control of a personally familiar face. We studied 12 healthy volunteers who made "unknown," "familiar," and "self" judgments about photographs of three types of faces: six different novel faces, a personally familiar face (participant's fraternity brother), and their own face during an event-related functional MRI (fMRI) experiment. Contrasting unknown faces with baseline showed activation of the inferior occipital lobe, which supports previous findings suggesting the presence of a generalized face-processing area within the inferior occipital-temporal region. Activation in response to a familiar face, when contrasted with an unknown face, invoked insula, middle temporal, inferior parietal, and medial frontal lobe activation, which is consistent with an existing hypothesis suggesting familiar face recognition taps neural substrates that are different from those involved in general facial processing. Brain response to self-face, when contrasted with familiar face, revealed activation in the right superior frontal gyrus, medial frontal and inferior parietal lobes, and left middle temporal gyrus. The contrast familiar vs. self produced activation only in the anterior cingulate gyrus. Our results support the existence of a bilateral network for both perceptual and executive aspects of self-face processing that cannot be accounted for by a simple hemispheric dominance model. This network is similar to those implicated in social cognition, mirror neuron matching, and face-name matching. Our findings also show that some regions of the medial frontal and parietal lobes are specifically activated by familiar faces but not unknown or self-faces, indicating that these regions may serve as markers of face familiarity and that the differences between activation associated with self-face recognition and familiar face recognition are subtle and appear to be localized to lateral frontal, parietal, and temporal regions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such studies suggest that a broad range of unimodal areas are engaged during self-recognition.”
From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Platek et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · Cited by 4,870
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.041 · Cited by 3,561
Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330508 · Cited by 3,202
Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.41 · Cited by 3,137
Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent
Friston, K. J., Worsley, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Mazziotta, J. C., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010306 · Cited by 1,907
Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:4 · Cited by 1,888
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Keenan JP, 2001, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and event related potentials suggest right prefrontal activation for self‐related processing, Brain Cogn, 47, 87
- Keenan JP, 2003, The self and schizophrenia: a neuropsychological perspective
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes
Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 · Cited by 2,010
Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis
Van Overwalle, F. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20547 · Cited by 1,792
Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis revisited
Eickhoff, S., Bzdok, D., Laird, A., Kurth, F., & Fox, P. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017 · Cited by 1,448
Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness.
Blanke, O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3292 · Cited by 1,147
How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network?
Qin, P., & Northoff, G. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.028 · Cited by 909
Metadata
- Authors
- Platek, S. M., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., Busch, S., Ruparel, K., Phend, N., Panyavin, I. S., & Langleben, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Platek, Steven M.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871291
- OpenAlex
- W2166333712
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD-19-03)
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh060722-10)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH19112, R01 MH-060722, R01-MH60722, MH60722, T32MH019112)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- self-face recognition, face familiarity, self-recognition, face processing, neural correlates, anterior cingulate cortex, medial frontal lobe, inferior parietal lobule, middle temporal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, hemispheric dominance, theory of mind, social cognition, mirror neuron system
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Face, Facial Expression, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
