Cited by 285Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory Processes and InfluencesHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex

Keenan, Julian Paul, Wheeler, Mark A., Gallup, Gordon G., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2000·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Although the anatomical and functional substrates subserving face recognition have been subject to extensive investigation, the underpinnings of self-face recognition are not well understood. Given the evidence that own-face recognition has been demonstrated by a select number of species, it is intriguing to speculate whether self-face recognition is accomplished via a 'self-network' or simply a 'face-network' within the brain. Furthermore, the relationship of self-recognition to other self-processes, such as self-evaluation and autobiographical retrieval, are not clearly defined. However, data from fMRI, ERPs and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as well as from split-brain studies and patients with focal lesions, indicate that the prefrontal cortex, with possible right hemisphere lateralization, may be a preferential component in self-recognition. Studies using these methods, as well as PET, have indicated that the self-processes of self-evaluation and autobiographical memory preferentially engage networks within the right fronto-temporal region. Although it is highly improbable that there is a 'self-recognition' or 'self' center, it appears that there may be a bias for the processing of 'self' within the right prefrontal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01521-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Core self-awareness assessed by Damasio and colleagues is based on self-recognition tasks subserved by distributed neural networks involving frontal-temporal and cortical midline structures.

    “Second, the “core” self-awareness assessed by Damasio and colleagues (Philippi et al., 2012; Damasio et al., 2013) is based on self-recognition tasks, which are subserved by distributed neural networks also involving the frontal–temporal network (Keenan et al., 2000) and cortical midline structures (Zhu et al., 2007; Han and Northoff, 2009).”

    From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Keenan et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Keenan, Julian Paul
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
338-344
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972820346
Cited by
285
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
self-face recognition, self-recognition, right prefrontal cortex, right hemisphere lateralization, self-assessment, autobiographical memory, face recognition (cognition), fronto-temporal network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review