The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality
Open accessAbstract
Identifying directional influences in anatomical and functional circuits presents one of the greatest challenges for understanding neural computations in the brain. Granger causality mapping (GCM) derived from vector autoregressive models of data has been employed for this purpose, revealing complex temporal and spatial dynamics underlying cognitive processes. However, the traditional GCM methods are computationally expensive, as signals from thousands of voxels within selected regions of interest (ROIs) are individually processed, and being based on pairwise Granger causality, they lack the ability to distinguish direct from indirect connectivity among brain regions. In this work a new algorithm called PCA based conditional GCM is proposed to overcome these problems. The algorithm implements the following two procedures: (i) dimensionality reduction in ROIs of interest with principle component analysis (PCA), and (ii) estimation of the direct causal influences in local brain networks, using conditional Granger causality. Our results show that the proposed method achieves greater accuracy in detecting network connectivity than the commonly used pairwise Granger causality method. Furthermore, the use of PCA components in conjunction with conditional GCM greatly reduces the computational cost relative to the use of individual voxel time series. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1058 · Cited by 6,256
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495
Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus
Vogt, B. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1704 · Cited by 1,810
Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029 · Cited by 1,360
Mayberg, H. S. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/65.1.193 · Cited by 1,166 · cited 1×
“The pattern of such interactions shown in our results is in agreement with the findings in the previous studies using various approaches [Etkin et al., 2006; Johansen-Berg et al., 2006; Mayberg, 2003; Ochsner and Gross, 2005; Vogt, 2005].”
ResultDing, M., Bressler, S. L., Yang, W., & Liang, H. (2000) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s004229900137 · Cited by 582
Self-citationBeyond Phrenology: What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us About Distributed Circuitry?
Friston, K. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142846 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis
Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Education and Practice · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100 · Cited by 1,994
DeVito, M. A., Gergle, D., & Birnholtz, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025659 · Cited by 311
Garner, J. K., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811 · Cited by 182
Gender representation in the public sector schools textbooks of Pakistan
Ullah, H., & Skelton, C. (2013) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2012.702892 · Cited by 141
Student privacy self-management: implications for learning analytics
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2723576.2723585 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Z., Chen, Y., Ding, M., Wright, P., Lu, Z., & Liu, Y.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2197-2206
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2041141830
- Cited by
- 978
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20661
- The paper
- Zhou, Z., Chen, Y., Ding, M., Wright, P., Lu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2009). Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.