The DOI matches its Crossref record; 156 of the 156 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing cortical network properties using TMS–EEG
Open accessAbstract
The past decade has seen significant developments in the concurrent use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to directly assess cortical network properties such as excitability and connectivity in humans. New hardware solutions, improved EEG amplifier technology, and advanced data processing techniques have allowed substantial reduction of the TMS‐induced artifact, which had previously rendered concurrent TMS–EEG impossible. Various physiological artifacts resulting from TMS have also been identified, and methods are being developed to either minimize or remove these sources of artifact. With these developments, TMS–EEG has unlocked regions of the cortex to researchers that were previously inaccessible to TMS. By recording the TMS‐evoked response directly from the cortex, TMS–EEG provides information on the excitability, effective connectivity, and oscillatory tuning of a given cortical area, removing the need to infer such measurements from indirect measures. In the following review, we investigate the different online and offline methods for reducing artifacts in TMS–EEG recordings and the physiological information contained within the TMS‐evoked cortical response. We then address the use of TMS–EEG to assess different cortical mechanisms such as cortical inhibition and neural plasticity, before briefly reviewing studies that have utilized TMS–EEG to explore cortical network properties at rest and during different functional brain states. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Bliss, T. V. P., & Gardner‐Medwin, A. R. (1973) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010274 · Cited by 7,437
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., & Freeston, I. L. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4 · Cited by 4,460
Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex
Huang, Y.-Z., Edwards, M. J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K. P., & Rothwell, J. C. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033 · Cited by 4,158
Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.
Kujirai, T., Caramia, M. D., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Thompson, P. D., Ferbert, A., Wroe, S., Asselman, P., & Marsden, C. D. (1993) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912 · Cited by 3,131
Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention
Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., & Desimone, R. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1055465 · Cited by 2,786
Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance
Sohal, V. S., Zhang, F., Yizhar, O., & Deisseroth, K. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07991 · Cited by 2,606
Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses
Cardin, J. A., Carlén, M., Meletis, K., Knoblich, U., Zhang, F., Deisseroth, K., Tsai, L.-H., & Moore, C. I. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08002 · Cited by 2,603
Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks
Bartos, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2044 · Cited by 2,070
Cited by
Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG
Tremblay, S., Rogasch, N. C., Premoli, I., Blumberger, D. M., Casarotto, S., Chen, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Farzan, F., Ferrarelli, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., et al. (2019) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.001 · Cited by 472
Self-citationHill, A. T., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Hoy, K. E. (2016) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.006 · Cited by 422
Self-citationRogasch, N. C., Sullivan, C., Thomson, R. H., Rose, N. S., Bailey, N. W., Fitzgerald, P. B., Farzan, F., & Hernandez-Pavon, J. C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.031 · Cited by 411
Self-citationTMS-EEG Signatures of GABAergic Neurotransmission in the Human Cortex
Premoli, I., Castellanos, N., Rivolta, D., Belardinelli, P., Bajo, R., Zipser, C., Espenhahn, S., Heidegger, T., Müller-Dahlhaus, F., & Ziemann, U. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5089-13.2014 · Cited by 393
Rogasch, N. C., Thomson, R. H., Farzan, F., Fitzgibbon, B. M., Bailey, N. W., Hernandez-Pavon, J. C., Daskalakis, Z. J., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.037 · Cited by 309
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogasch, N. C., & Fitzgerald, P. B.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-29
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1652-1669
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2023386843
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 156
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing cortical network properties using TMS–EEG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.22016
- The paper
- Rogasch, N. C., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2013). Assessing cortical network properties using TMS–EEG. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
