The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landmark‐guided region‐based spatial normalization for functional magnetic resonance imaging
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
As the size of the neuroimaging cohorts being increased to address key questions in the field of cognitive neuroscience, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, the accuracy of the spatial normalization as an essential preprocessing step becomes extremely important. Existing spatial normalization methods have poor accuracy particularly when dealing with the highly convoluted human cerebral cortex and when brain morphology is severely altered (e.g., aging populations). To address this shortcoming, we propose a novel spatial normalization technique that takes advantage of the existing surface‐based human brain parcellation to automatically identify and match regional landmarks. To simplify the nonlinear whole brain registration, the identified landmarks of each region and its counterpart are registered independently with topology‐preserving deformation. Next, the regional warping fields are combined by an inverse distance weighted interpolation technique to have a global warping field for the whole brain. To ensure that the final warping field is topology‐preserving, we used simultaneously forward and reverse maps with certain symmetric constraints to yield bijectivity. We have evaluated our proposed solution using both simulated and real (structural and functional) human brain images. Our evaluation shows that our solution can enhance structural correspondence compared to the existing methods. Such improvement also increases the sensitivity and specificity of the functional imaging studies, reducing the required number of subjects and subsequent study costs. We conclude that our proposed solution can effectively substitute existing substandard spatial normalization methods to deal with the demand of large cohorts which is now common in clinical and aging studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Petersen, R. C., Xu, Y. C., Waring, S. C., O'Brien, P. C., Tangalos, E. G., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., & Kokmen, E. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.49.3.786 · Cited by 1,128
Cortical folding patterns and predicting cytoarchitecture
Fischl, B., Rajendran, N., Busa, E., Augustinack, J., Hinds, O., Yeo, B. T. T., Mohlberg, H., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm225 · Cited by 737
Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration – A deep learning approach
Yang, X., Kwitt, R., Styner, M., & Niethammer, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008 · Cited by 630
Atlas Renormalization for Improved Brain MR Image Segmentation Across Scanner Platforms
Han, X., & Fischl, B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.893282 · Cited by 215
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/J.MEDIA.2005.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.1999.0437 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2011.2108665 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 · DOI
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:VISI.0000043755.93987.aa · DOI
- 10.1109/34.24792 · DOI
- 10.1109/42.932742 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.media.2008.06.010 · DOI
- Edwards P. Hill D. Little J. &Sahni V. Hawkes D.(1995).Medical image registration incorporating deformations.BMVC(pp. 1–10).https://doi.org/10.5244/c.9.69 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/bhg087 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature18933 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · DOI · Paper page
- Guo H. Rangarajan A. &Joshi S. C.(2005).3‐D diffeomorphic shape registration on hippocampal data sets.International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (pp. 984–991).https://doi.org/10.1007/11566489_121 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051 · DOI · Paper page
- He H. &Razlighi Q.(2020).Volumetric registration of brain cortical regions by automatic landmark matching and large deformation diffeomorphisms.Proceedings—International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. IEEE Computer Society (pp. 1412–1415).https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098572 · DOI
- 10.1007/11505730_16 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2007.901432 · DOI
- 10.1109/83.855431 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2012.2186975 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuang D.(2019).Cycle‐consistent training for reducing negative Jacobian determinant in deep registration networks.International Workshop on Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging. Springer (pp. 120–129).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32778-1_13 · DOI
- Lepore N. Joshi A. A. Leahy R. M. Brun C. Chou Y. ‐Y. Pennec X. Lee A. D. Barysheva M. De Zubicaray G. I. Wright M. J. McMahon K. L. Toga A. W. &Thompson P. M.(2010).A new combined surface and volume registration.Medical Imaging 2010: Image Processing. International Society for Optics and Photonics (p. 76231E).https://doi.org/10.1117/12.844434 · DOI
- 10.1006/cviu.1997.0608 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.23597 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0503892102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnins.2019.00821 · DOI
- Pitiot A. Malandain G. Bardinet E. &Thompson P. M.(2003).Piecewise affine registration of biological images.International Workshop on Biomedical Image Registration(pp. 91–101). · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2018.2816402 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004426 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhw179 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084 · DOI · Paper page
- Saladin K. S., 2008, Human anatomy
- Shepard D.(1968).A two‐dimensional interpolation function for irregularly‐spaced data.Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference(pp. 517–524).https://doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616 · DOI
- Simonovsky M. Gutiérrez‐Becker B. Mateus D. Navab N.&Komodakis N.(2016 October).A deep metric for multimodal registration.International conference on medical image computing and computer‐assisted intervention(pp. 10–18). Springer Cham. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · DOI · Paper page
- Sommer S. Nielsen M. Lauze F. &Pennec X.(2011).A multi‐scale kernel bundle for LDDMM: Towards sparse deformation description across space and scales.Biennial International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging(pp. 624–635).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_51 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80022-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70880-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2012.06.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TMI.2009.2030797 · DOI
- Zhang M. Liao R. Dalca A. V. Turk E.A. Luo J. Grant p.E. &Golland P.(2017).Frequency diffeomorphisms for efficient image registration.International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging(pp. 559–570).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_44 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- He, H., & Razlighi, Q. R.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- He, Hengda
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3524-3544
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC9248321
- OpenAlex
- W4223532917
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K01AG044467, R01AG057962)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- spatial normalization, landmark matching, brain parcellation, inverse distance weighting, cerebral cortex, brain aging, neurodegenerative diseases
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review