Cited by 7Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Landmark‐guided region‐based spatial normalization for functional magnetic resonance imaging

Open access
He, Hengda, Razlighi, Qolamreza R.·2022·Human Brain Mapping

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

As the size of the neuroimaging cohorts being increased to address key questions in the field of cognitive neuroscience, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, the accuracy of the spatial normalization as an essential preprocessing step becomes extremely important. Existing spatial normalization methods have poor accuracy particularly when dealing with the highly convoluted human cerebral cortex and when brain morphology is severely altered (e.g., aging populations). To address this shortcoming, we propose a novel spatial normalization technique that takes advantage of the existing surface‐based human brain parcellation to automatically identify and match regional landmarks. To simplify the nonlinear whole brain registration, the identified landmarks of each region and its counterpart are registered independently with topology‐preserving deformation. Next, the regional warping fields are combined by an inverse distance weighted interpolation technique to have a global warping field for the whole brain. To ensure that the final warping field is topology‐preserving, we used simultaneously forward and reverse maps with certain symmetric constraints to yield bijectivity. We have evaluated our proposed solution using both simulated and real (structural and functional) human brain images. Our evaluation shows that our solution can enhance structural correspondence compared to the existing methods. Such improvement also increases the sensitivity and specificity of the functional imaging studies, reducing the required number of subjects and subsequent study costs. We conclude that our proposed solution can effectively substitute existing substandard spatial normalization methods to deal with the demand of large cohorts which is now common in clinical and aging studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.25865

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/J.MEDIA.2005.04.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/nimg.1999.0437 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TMI.2011.2108665 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 · DOI
  6. 10.3389/fninf.2014.00044 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538 · DOI
  8. 10.1023/B:VISI.0000043755.93987.aa · DOI
  9. 10.1109/34.24792 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/42.932742 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.024 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.media.2008.06.010 · DOI
  14. Edwards P. Hill D. Little J. &Sahni V. Hawkes D.(1995).Medical image registration incorporating deformations.BMVC(pp. 1–10).https://doi.org/10.5244/c.9.69 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/cercor/bhg087 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature18933 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Guo H. Rangarajan A. &Joshi S. C.(2005).3‐D diffeomorphic shape registration on hippocampal data sets.International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (pp. 984–991).https://doi.org/10.1007/11566489_121 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051 · DOI · Paper page
  21. He H. &Razlighi Q.(2020).Volumetric registration of brain cortical regions by automatic landmark matching and large deformation diffeomorphisms.Proceedings—International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. IEEE Computer Society (pp. 1412–1415).https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098572 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/11505730_16 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TMI.2007.901432 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/83.855431 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TMI.2012.2186975 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kuang D.(2019).Cycle‐consistent training for reducing negative Jacobian determinant in deep registration networks.International Workshop on Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging. Springer (pp. 120–129).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32778-1_13 · DOI
  28. Lepore N. Joshi A. A. Leahy R. M. Brun C. Chou Y. ‐Y. Pennec X. Lee A. D. Barysheva M. De Zubicaray G. I. Wright M. J. McMahon K. L. Toga A. W. &Thompson P. M.(2010).A new combined surface and volume registration.Medical Imaging 2010: Image Processing. International Society for Optics and Photonics (p. 76231E).https://doi.org/10.1117/12.844434 · DOI
  29. 10.1006/cviu.1997.0608 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/hbm.23597 · DOI
  31. 10.1073/pnas.0503892102 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006 · DOI
  33. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00821 · DOI
  34. Pitiot A. Malandain G. Bardinet E. &Thompson P. M.(2003).Piecewise affine registration of biological images.International Workshop on Biomedical Image Registration(pp. 91–101). · DOI
  35. 10.1109/TMI.2018.2816402 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004426 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/cercor/bhw179 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Saladin K. S., 2008, Human anatomy
  40. Shepard D.(1968).A two‐dimensional interpolation function for irregularly‐spaced data.Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference(pp. 517–524).https://doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616 · DOI
  41. Simonovsky M. Gutiérrez‐Becker B. Mateus D. Navab N.&Komodakis N.(2016 October).A deep metric for multimodal registration.International conference on medical image computing and computer‐assisted intervention(pp. 10–18). Springer Cham. · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Sommer S. Nielsen M. Lauze F. &Pennec X.(2011).A multi‐scale kernel bundle for LDDMM: Towards sparse deformation description across space and scales.Biennial International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging(pp. 624–635).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_51 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80022-4 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70880-3 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2012.06.019 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.023 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1109/TMI.2009.2030797 · DOI
  50. Zhang M. Liao R. Dalca A. V. Turk E.A. Luo J. Grant p.E. &Golland P.(2017).Frequency diffeomorphisms for efficient image registration.International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging(pp. 559–570).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_44 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
He, H., & Razlighi, Q. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
He, Hengda
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-12
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
3524-3544
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W4223532917
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K01AG044467, R01AG057962)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
spatial normalization, landmark matching, brain parcellation, inverse distance weighting, cerebral cortex, brain aging, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review