The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the mediating neuroanatomy of implicit and explicit sequence learning using a modified version of the serial reaction time (SRT) paradigm. Subjects were seven healthy, right‐handed adults (three male, four female, mean age 26.7, range 18–43 yr). PET data were acquired via the oxygen‐15‐labeled‐carbon dioxide inhalation method while subjects performed the SRT. Subjects were scanned during two blocks each of (1) no sequence (Random), (2) single‐blind, 12‐item sequence (Implicit), and (3) unblinded, same sequence (Explicit). Whole‐brain‐normalized images reflecting relative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were transformed to Talairach space, and statistical parametric maps (SPMs) of z‐scores were generated for comparisons of interest. The threshold for significant activation was defined as z‐score ≥ 3.00. Behavioral data demonstrated significant learning (P < .05) for Implicit and Explicit conditions. Tests of explicit knowledge reflected non‐significant explicit contamination during the Implicit condition. Foci of significant activation in the Implicit condition were found in right ventral premotor cortex, right ventral caudate/nucleus accumbens, right thalamus, and bilateral area 19; activation in the Explicit condition included primary visual cortex, peri‐sylvian cortex, and cerebellar vermis. Activations in visual and language areas during the Explicit condition may reflect conscious learning strategies including covert verbal rehearsal and visual imagery. Right‐sided premotor, striatal, and thalamic activations support the notion that implicit sequence learning is mediated by cortico‐striatal pathways, preferentially within the right hemisphere. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035032 · Cited by 1,163
Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fazio, F. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371600a0 · Cited by 976
Rauch, S. L. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010062008 · Cited by 880
Self-citationFunctional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET
Grafton, S., Mazziotta, J., Presty, S., Friston, K., Frackowiak, R., & Phelps, M. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-07-02542.1992 · Cited by 607
Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.
Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.189 · Cited by 594
Self-citationProcedural learning is impaired in Huntington's disease: Evidence from the serial reaction time task
Knopman, D., & Nissen, M. J. (1991) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(91)90085-m · Cited by 377
Motor learning in man: a positron emission tomographic study
Seitz, R. J., Roland, P. E., Bohm, C., Greitz, T., & Stone-Elander, S. (1990) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199009000-00016 · Cited by 376
Grafton, S. T., Woods, R. P., & Tyszka, M. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010307 · Cited by 214
Cited by
The Basal Ganglia and Chunking of Action Repertoires
Graybiel, A. M. (1998) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1006/nlme.1998.3843 · Cited by 1,042
Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning
Doyon, J., Bellec, P., Amsel, R., Penhune, V., Monchi, O., Carrier, J., Lehéricy, S., & Benali, H. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012 · Cited by 783
Are spatial memories strengthened in the human hippocampus during slow wave sleep?
Peigneux, P., Laureys, S., Fuchs, S., Collette, F., Perrin, F., Reggers, J., Phillips, C., Degueldre, C., Del Fiore, G., Aerts, J., et al. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.007 · Cited by 766
Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans
Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. (1995) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.4.497 · Cited by 720
An fMRI Study of the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning
Schendan, H. E., Searl, M. M., Melrose, R. J., & Stern, C. E. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00123-5 · Cited by 610
Metadata
- Authors
- Rauch, S. L., Savage, C. R., Brown, H. D., Curran, T., Alpert, N. M., Kendrick, A., Fischman, A. J., & Kosslyn, S. M.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 271-286
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2093942907
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.460030403
- The paper
- Rauch, S. L., Savage, C. R., Brown, H. D., Curran, T., Alpert, N. M., Kendrick, A., Fischman, A. J., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1995). A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.460030403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.