Cited by 189Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatment

The impact of waiting time on patient outcomes: Evidence from early intervention in psychosis services in E ngland

Open access
Reichert, Anika, Jacobs, Rowena·2018·Health Economics

Abstract

Recently, new emphasis was put on reducing waiting times in mental health services as there is an ongoing concern that longer waiting time for treatment leads to poorer health outcomes. However, little is known about delays within the mental health service system and its impact on patients. We explore the impact of waiting times on patient outcomes in the context of early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in England from April 2012 to March 2015. We use the Mental Health Services Data Set and the routine outcome measure the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale. In a generalised linear regression model, we control for baseline outcomes, previous service use, and treatment intensity to account for possible endogeneity in waiting time. We find that longer waiting time is significantly associated with a deterioration in patient outcomes 12 months after acceptance for treatment for patients that are still in EIP care. Effects are strongest for waiting times longer than 3 months, and effect sizes are small to moderate. Patients with shorter treatment periods are not affected. The results suggest that policies should aim to reduce excessively long waits in order to improve outcomes for patients waiting for treatment for psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.3800

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Failure to access the right support at the right time can lead to a worsening of symptoms, comorbidities, and adverse outcomes, including hospitalization or suicide.

    “Referral to the appropriate healthcare service is a pivotal point in the treatment pathway, as failure to access the right support at the right time can lead to a worsening of symptoms, comorbidities, and adverse outcomes, including hospitalization or suicide [Williams et al., 2008, Reichert and Jacobs, 2018, De Girolamo et al., 2012].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NICE (2014). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: Prevention and management In Clinical guideline. Manchester: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 32207892

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichert, A., & Jacobs, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Health Economics University of York York UK
  • University of York (GB)
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1772-1787
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
OpenAlex
W2884420074
Cited by
189
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
waiting time, early intervention in psychosis, psychosis, mental health services, treatment delay, patient outcomes, Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, treatment intensity, service utilization, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, England, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Psychotic Disorders, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Waiting Lists, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review